Fanedit.org Forums Fanedit.info Preserv.co.cc
Shop Chatroom Register to FE
 
Skip to header | Skip to content
FANEDIT.ORG - HOME OF THE FANEDITS
Doom – The Posessed Re-Cut

TCM by CBBby CBB

The darkest and most scariest version of DOOM you will ever watch. Gone are the lame jokes and the bad acting. The plot has been corrected to really work for what this is: A terrifying and cool monster hunt on Mars.

member ratings: 39 votes, average: 9.10 out of 1039 votes, average: 9.10 out of 1039 votes, average: 9.10 out of 1039 votes, average: 9.10 out of 1039 votes, average: 9.10 out of 1039 votes, average: 9.10 out of 1039 votes, average: 9.10 out of 1039 votes, average: 9.10 out of 1039 votes, average: 9.10 out of 1039 votes, average: 9.10 out of 10 (39 votes, average: 9.10 out of 10, rated) Loading ... Loading ...
original film name: Doom – unrated director’s cut
new film name : Doom – the posessed re-cut
film studio name : Universal
edit crew name : CBB

Date Original Film Was Released : 2005
Date Edit Was Released : 18 NOV 2006

Original Runtime : 113 min
New Runtime : 96 min

Amount of time Cut/Added : 2 minutes added 9 minutes cut

Cuts removed/added/extended :

  1. Added intro sequence using scenes from Resident Evil and Doom Trailer.
  2. Removed white shoes.
  3. Removed legs cutting scene.
  4. Removed strip search thread.
  5. Removed Mac scene.
  6. Removed Dr Grimm and Duke teasing.
  7. Removed Reaper flashback.
  8. Kept C24 explanation (which is a huge difference to Scaperat’s first edit).
  9. Removed almost the entire Ego Shooter sequence, except for plot.
  10. Re-arranged ego shooter leftover.
  11. Re-sounded ego shooter leftover.
  12. Removed flying sequence from showdown.
  13. Added new end credits


Conceptual improvements/advancements of edit over original:

I tried to make this a scarier, darker, less funny experience, pretty much in the spirit of ALIENS. This is not supposed to be a video game movie anymore. It is supposed to be a true horror/action movie. Therefore I cut a lot of nonsense and crap, most of all the ego shooter sequence, which just did not fit to the overall atmosphere, and the teasing scene between Duke and Samantha, which was really hard to take because of bad acting. My edit is based on Scaperat’s ideas and his fanedit: Doom – the posessed cut. I made this edition with his authorization.

DVD Details:
96 minutes NTSC 2.35 anamorphic widescreeen AC3-5.1
Single Layer, 3.8GB, 4500kb/s vbr video, 448kb/s cbr audio
languages ENGLISH GERMAN
subtitles: ENGLISH
Animated menus
Cover and disc art
2 deleted scenes

Time needed for the edition: planning: 1 week editing: 5 days sound editing: 2 days DVD layout and features: 7 days persons involved: 1

Buy the original DVD and support FANEDIT.ORG:

IMAGES cover1 by boon23 (DOWNLOAD HERE): cover 2 by boon23 (DOWNLOAD HERE): cover 3 by AvP (DOWNLOAD HERE): FANEDITFORUM LINK You must own the original movie before acquiring any FanEdited movie. We here at FanEdit.org respect the company’s copyrights, and don’t want to infringe on any company’s rights. Thank you, FE! Maybe downloadable from Fanedit.info through Rapidshare (enter and download at your own risk and responsibility)

11 Review »

  1. awesome. doom as it was meant to be seen. editing, audio, video, entertainment, fanediting ideas, creativity…. all 5/5 for me. one of my favorite CBB edits, and one not often talked about. as many of you 25-30 year old males, i grew up on DOOM and this edit takes a complete failure of a movie (like a 2/5!) turns and the enjoyment level ALL the way up.

    not the best *film* – but for fanediting precision, i give this a 5/5.

    Review by joebshmoe — February 13, 2009 @ 6:58 pm

  2. You achieved what you set out for. The action and no lame jokes. So this was an excellent edit. I still miss the video game shootout scene. That is what made the original good to me.
    If you’re looking for what CBB did to Doom then you will enjoy this edit.

    Review by rmania — May 24, 2009 @ 6:52 pm

  3. Doom was an awful movie and the best thing I can say about this edit is that it’s not as awful anymore. Technically flawless, it’s a great editing job that removes the most ridiculous moments from the movie. Unfortunately, it doesn’t elevate it above your standard space monster B-movie fare. This is no fault of the editor; he did the best that could be done using the source material.

    If you HAVE to watch Doom, watch this version. Otherwise there are much better movies out there, fanedited or otherwise.

    6/10

    Review by blueyoda — June 8, 2009 @ 4:14 pm

  4. Great take on a bad movie. I liked it a lot now.

    Review by r8s8fr8 — November 27, 2009 @ 8:21 pm

  5. I don’t know how you did it. It was very enjoyable. Thank you. 10/10

    Review by Derelict Mind — February 5, 2010 @ 5:47 am

  6. Another one of those cool idea/bad movie flicks with a halfway decent story inside it waiting for someone skilled to come along and do the necessary surgery. While this gaming-derived story was never going be “Aliens” it is now no longer too painful to watch. In fact it’s a quite serviceable dark action/horror film perfect for a Saturday night with pizza, beer and a few fellow aficionados of bad sci-fi in which even in the future a lunkhead gyrine is skill instantly recognizable. None of which would happen without the excellent CBB work driven by the mantra that less is more. I give it a 7.5/10 overall (say 6/10 for the story and 9/10 for the technical execution and quality fanedit package).

    Review by sdavmor — April 21, 2010 @ 12:15 am

  7. An entertaining cut, I enjoyed it, the editing was seamless and high quality

    Highly recommended

    Review by jelio — May 26, 2010 @ 6:47 pm

  8. I’m not as enthusiastic about this cut then others. It’s true that this edit cut out a lot of the crap from the original, but it wasn’t significantly better. It doesn’t make the film great. It’s not really scary or terrifying. It did make the film more watchable, so it succeeds on that end. As much as this turd can be polished, it’s still just a straight action movie. The source material can’t be raised much higher

    movie – 7/10

    Review by asocialjester — June 12, 2010 @ 9:02 pm

  9. Doom… The shooter everyone loves, the film everyone loves to hate.
    When I first read about a Doom film being released, I couldn’t help but feel both ways: excitement, and pre-emptive disappointment.
    Films like that are bound to be shot down before they can even take flight properly. Especially if they star Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson.

    The original film had its moment but was an annoying action film with horror twists, at best.
    Johnson was seriously overacting as the film progressed, and Richard Brake’s character Portman was annoying more than anything else.
    Although I don’t always blame the actors –Brake’s actually a good actor himself– it was obvious that he wasn’t really trying to come off as convincing.
    Either that, or he was having too much fun being obnoxious.
    Having said that, there were two things I thought the film could have done without:
    1. Portman’s antics
    2. Sarge’s swearing

    * CBB’s edit takes away much, if not everything, of the previous, but sadly leaves the latter intact.
    I would have liked to have seen an edit that would cut out most of Sarge’s early swearing, to have him start swearing as the film progressed,
    somewhat displaying his growing anger and disappointment on not having the situation under control.
    * Portman’s white golf shoes and ‘level 5 quarantine frisk search’ perversities were about all could take the first fifteen minutes.
    (Although Duke trying to hit on Samantha came in a seriously close second.)
    * Karl Urban obviously carried what little was left of this film, and did a more than okay job.
    * Pinky (what’s in a name?) wasn’t much of an addition either, and I wouldn’t have cared if CBB had just cut him out completely after everyone else overheard him being attacked in the com room. The part where Portman is yanked off the toilet always seemed very weird to me, in that sense. Portman is dangling upside down, which always made me feel as if that was the director’s attempt at being funny, with Pinky giving the screen a quick glimpse, and chuckling.
    It’s quite embarrassing to admit, but I never quite got the meaning of that scene, until I started contemplating it after having seen CBB’s edit.
    The slight chuckle was needed to show Pinky was actually enjoying seeing Portman die, thus confirming his psychotic side.
    Cutting out Pinky completely after the attack would be difficult, but it would also allow the editor to get rid of both Portman hanging upside down, and Pinky laughing about it. That way, Portman’s death could be confirmed only via the screaming they hear on their coms. Which would have been a nice edit.

    Anyway, since I’m drifting off… Here’s the final showdown:
    ————————————-
    TECHNICAL ASPECTS
    ————————————-
    VIDEO:
    Couldn’t notice a single glitch, hiccup, hard cut or anything of the kind (not that I was looking for them).
    The Ego shooter sequence could have been dropped completely in my opinion but, as mentioned before, was somewhat pivotal to move the story along.
    That said, I didn’t really like the way the first person view blended in with the emergency light. It kind of seemed forced, not having another window to do a better edit.
    Overall: 5 out of 5 stars

    AUDIO:
    Again, no flaws here. Everything was fine.

    Overall:
    5 out of 5 stars

    PRESENTATION:
    Compared to other CBB edits, the menu seemed kind of dull to me, and rather disappointed me. I was really expecting another CBB gem here.

    Overall: 3 out of 5 stars

    ————————————————–
    FINAL SCORE: 4 out of 5 stars
    ————————————————–
    For what the edit is worth, it receives 4 stars. It remains a rather bad film, but the edit makes it more bearable.

    In the end I can sympathize with L8wrtr, in that he wanted to create a fan-edit that for himself and possibly many others can watch without having to find the fast forward button!

    Review by Radi0n — August 4, 2010 @ 7:10 am

  10. The bottom sentence of my review obviously has nothing to do with this Doom edit. I’m not embarrassed to say I borrowed another poster’s layout, but simply overlooked the final sentence. Nevertheless, my apologies.

    Review by Radi0n — August 4, 2010 @ 7:16 am

  11. This is masterfully done, hands down. While there are still things that are a bit cringe worthy, the source material cannot be overcome with that aspect… and that’s fine. However, the overall ambient theme of this edition is far superior to the original.

    10 out of 10.

    Review by ionvox — December 27, 2010 @ 6:50 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a REVIEW:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Theme by boon23, powered by WordPress

Superman Pictures (except for Superman Returns: Copyright CapedWonder.com; Bowers Imagineering; Warner Bros; and DC Comics. All Rights Reserved 2006. Used by permission from Jim Bowers. Visitors to the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites are advised that all fanedits contained within the pages of the websites are believed to be fanedits and/or preservation projects of films from personal collections which fall under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include— 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Since fanedits contained here are mainly created out of criticisms, research, and are completely nonprofit, we here at the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites believe that they fall under the requirements of the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107. However, no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information are made. Visitors are encouraged to review the official version of all documents upon which they plan to download as well as to make completely sure they own a legitimate, original copy of anything they may wish to download. The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites cannot give this permission. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Links to Other Sites - Some of the linked sites are not under the control of the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites. Therefore, the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websitesmake no representations concerning their content, and are not responsible for their content. That the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites have provided a link to a site is not an endorsement, or an indication of affiliation with the owners or publishers of any fanedits and all related materials. There are risks in using any information, services or fanedits found on the Internet via any outside links; and the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites caution you to make sure that you completely understand these risks before retrieving, using, relying upon, or downloading anything via the Internet. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Members, Fanedits and Links The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites reserves the right to refuse services at any time. Notification that Information Provided by You is Public Information Any information provided by you to the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites, including but not limited to feedback, questions, comments, suggestions, download links, etc., etc., are considered non-confidential since it is a public website; moreover, such information is a public record subject to public inspection pursuant to law. The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites has no obligation of any kind with respect to such information and cannot be held responsible for the decisions nor the actions of any individuals of the entire Internet community at large. By downloading any fanedit, the downloader assumes all responsibilities thereof as well as all the consequences that may incur. CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED!




http://fanedit.org/feed/http://fanedit.org/comments/feed/