Fanedit.org Forums Fanedit.info Preserv.co.cc
Shop Chatroom Register to FE
 
Skip to header | Skip to content
FANEDIT.ORG - HOME OF THE FANEDITS
A.I. – Super-Toys last all summer long 2.0

by JasonN
Initially, this edit was started to develop a better ending for the film – at the same time, the faneditor discovered the original short story by Brian Aldiss that provided the basis of the film. So he decided to make the film more akin to the themes of the short story, in addition to changing the ending to better fit those concepts.
member ratings:13 votes, average: 7.15 out of 1013 votes, average: 7.15 out of 1013 votes, average: 7.15 out of 1013 votes, average: 7.15 out of 1013 votes, average: 7.15 out of 1013 votes, average: 7.15 out of 1013 votes, average: 7.15 out of 1013 votes, average: 7.15 out of 1013 votes, average: 7.15 out of 1013 votes, average: 7.15 out of 10 (13 votes, average: 7.15 out of 10, rated) Loading ... Loading ...

Original Title: Artificial Intelligence (or A.I.)

New Title: Artificial Intelligence [super-toys last all summer long]
Release on FE: January 2009
Original Runtime: 2 hours, 26 minutes
Edit Runtime: 1 hour, 39 minutes
Time Cut: roughly 47 minutes
Software Used: Sony Vegas 7 (video/audio editing), Bauhuas Mirage (compositing), Audacity (sound editing), DVD Architect 4.5 (DVD authoring)

DVD Features

  • DVD Format: NTSC – DVD9 DL
  • Region: 0 (region free)
  • Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1, 16×9 widescreen
  • Audio format: 5.1 Dolby Digital
  • Language: English
  • Subtitles: none
  • Custom DVD Menus
  • DVD Extras: Alternative Ending: “Happily Ever After…”
  • DVD Extras: Fanedit Trailers – “The Matrix Evolutions”, “Silent Hill: Red God Remix”, and “Noir Simulacrum”

Major Edits/Changes
Change/Cuts: David’s Family & Monica aka “Mommy”
In the original story, the Swinton family really didn’t give a damn about David: he was merely an object, a “toy” for them play with and use. The Monica character was more conflicted about her feelings for David than Henry (because David really did “love” his Mommy), but in the end, she continued to view him as an artificial mecha (never as a real child). For this Edit, I decided to remove any additional scenes/subplots that focused the story more on the Henry, Monica, and Martin characters instead of David: this was because I felt that once David finally “awakened” in the story (i.e., when he is imprinted onto Monica and became a true conscious entity), the film’s focus should be entirely on him and his quest to become real.

Cuts: “Pool Party” + “Letters to Mommy” Scenes
The Pool Scene was one of the major scenes that I hated from the original film, both from a narrative point of view (Martin hates David… OK, we get it now…) and from a logical perspective (so spinach can harm David, but not water? WTF?!). With the scene gone, the ending that I developed for the Edit (David “dying” in the ocean) is now plausible and understandable.
The Letters Scene I was a little more hesitant on removing, because it was a scene from the original short story. However, Spielberg completely missed the point of it: in the short story, the focus of the scene was on David and his attempts to understand these feelings he had toward Monica; the film, however, he pulled the viewers focus entirely on Monica and her “dilemma” on what to do with David (also, the scene no longer had any context due to the Pool Party scene being removed).

Changes/Cuts: Gigolo Joe
Gigolo Joe never meets the murderer of his female client.

Cuts: No Philosopher Robots
I prefer it when a film’s philosophical concepts are presented either informally or as subtext – NOT when characters on screen go jabbering on and on about Humanity’s prejudices/intolerances and random crap like humans’ “Rite of Blood”. Also, I felt that only David (and to a lesser extent, Gigolo Joe) should be advanced enough to contemplate intellectual/emotive human concepts.

Cuts: Professor Hobby
A few minor cuts which dealt with Hobby and his son who had died (and who was the basis for David’s design) – the notion is still there, except now it’s just briefly implied (and doesn’t beat the viewers over the head with scenes of Hobby looking at his dead son’s photo).

Changes/Cuts: The Ending
This was the major reason I decided to do this edit, as I absolutely and completely HATE the ending of the original film. For me, having David finally realize the truth of his nature – that he can never be a real human, that he is a mere ‘product’ for humans to use and discard, and most importantly of all, that he will never gain the love of the one being that he loves above everything else (his “Mommy”) – and then choose to end his existence rather than continue to live a never-ending lie, that is what I believe the end of A.I. should have been.
So we have the following changes:
- No jump to 2000 years into the future
- No aliens/robots (yes, they’re technically supposed to be advanced robots, but come on Spielberg, get more original with their design!)
- No meeting the (fake) Blue Fairy
- No one day together with (fake) “Mommy”
- No going to sleep/being able to “dream”

Change: End Credits
For this, I switched the color scheme of the credits from “white text on a black background” to a “black text on a white background” scheme – the music for the credits was also changed from John William’s score to a song of my choice (which is listed at the start of the end credits).

Persons involved: JasonN

Additional Comment:

Artificial Intelligence is one of the first experiences in my life where I walked out of the cinema HATING the film that I had just seen.

The strange thing is, it wasn’t like I hated everything about the film; there were many things about it that I found interesting and engaging (the concept of robots becoming human, the fairy tale aspect of the story, the archetypal “odd” characters, the questionable “morality” of the narrative). However, there were an equal amount of things in the movie that I totally despised and ruined whatever positive aspects that I had observed (especially the end, which to this day continues to infuriate me more than any other film ending).

Initially, this edit was started to develop a better ending for the film – at the same time, I discovered the original short story by Brian Aldiss that provided the basis of the film (which I totally fell in love with). So I decided to make the film more akin to the themes of the short story, in addition to changing the ending to better fit those concepts.

Additional Information: On the request of the faneditor v.1 is no longer available, because with this version it has become obsolete

Buy the original DVD and support FANEDIT.ORG by shopping through one of the Amazon widgets:

IMAGES:

cover art by JasonN (download here):

FANEDITFORUM LINK

You must own the original movie before acquiring any FanEdited movie. We here at FanEdit.org respect the company’s copyrights, and don’t want to infringe on any company’s rights. Thank you, FE!

Maybe downloadable from Fanedit.info through Rapidshare  (enter and download at your own risk and responsibility)

14 Review »

  1. The edit:
    This is a pretty good fanedit. There were no hard cuts, no flaws to the image or the plot which I did notice, the plot was complete and although I did really like the Alien ending and thought it would still make more sense to the story than David’s suicide does, it had a nice flow to it. To me the ending came to abrupt and I would have needed a bit more information on the suicidal tendencies of David. Also the “adventure” seemed rather short to me, especially when Prof. Hubby mentions it as a big deal. So, the new ending is not totally convincing to me and left me a bit unimpressed, meanwhile the original ending and the “loving” act of the aliens to fulfill his biggest wish ever and let him then die, forced me to tears. This way, it’s all very cold. This does not mean, that it is wrong, the coldness is part of the story all along and most of the time, it is merely David, the machine, who brings emotion into the orga world. I enjoyed watching this version a lot and I think the faneditor addressed the correct spots to be corrected. Unlike the original I was not bored to death. Well done.
    editing: 5 of 5,
    entertainment: 4 of 5

    Image quality:
    The image quality is perfect (IMO).
    video quality: 5 of 5

    Audio quality:
    The audio is could be slightly louder, else it is perfect, no hard cuts, no flaws. There is a repeating audio stutter to the end credits song, but since I don’t know it, it could be intentional.
    audio: 4 of 5

    The DVD:
    The DVD comes with a nice still menu, scene selection and an about menu. All the menus look real good. Animation would have been great, but still, an exceptional DVD design from what I am used to. Audio to the menus would have been nice. No artwork is attached.
    DVD: 4 of 5

    resulting in a 4 of 5 overall rating from me. This is a very good fanedit and definitely a huge improvement over the original. I recommend anyone who liked A.I. a bit and owns the original to watch this one.

    Review by boon23 — November 28, 2007 @ 11:26 pm

  2. Ive always been uncomfortable with the bolt-on happy ending that Spielburg seemingly slapped on at the end of this film. I’ve always known where I thought the ending should be – but is it in the same place as JasonN thinks?

    The answer is no. I’ll get to that in a minute.

    SPOILERS AHEAD.

    Technically – great edit, seemless work here, no jaring bits or sound problems.

    I liked the shortened start of the film. David is less adopted now, quickly thrown – it feels much more chilling. The bit’s you’ve chopped I didn’t even notice weren’t there, except the pool party – I appreciate why you chopped it, but as I recall – they just leave David at the bottom of the pool – uncared for, which may have emphasised that they don’t give a damn for him.

    Didn’t recall or remember the other chops you made.

    Joe – now as I understood it – he was framed? Cutting that bit out makes no sense as to why the Police want to arrest him later.

    We carry on fine now, until a very abrupt ending. My feeling was that the film should have ended with David, in the chopper stranded under the sea chanting the mantra of Blue Fairy making him into a real boy. Although nicely seemless, the ending comes too fast and is David capable of suicide? I don’t think so. If he is, we haven’t been given enough information to appreciate that.

    Leaving the Joe subplot in would explain his arrest and would allow a continuance to David trapped under the sea.

    Anyway, that’s just my quids worth.

    I think you’ve done an excellent job here – the film is much darker, much more chilling as well. Good work.

    Review by white43 — March 22, 2008 @ 6:21 pm

  3. “My feeling was that the film should have ended with David, in the chopper stranded under the sea chanting the mantra of Blue Fairy making him into a real boy. Although nicely seemless, the ending comes too fast and is David capable of suicide? I don’t think so. If he is, we haven’t been given enough information to appreciate that.”

    For me, the question of David’s “suicide” is due directly to Spielberg’s poor writing of that plotpoint – you’re right, there isn’t much info presented in the film about it, but I didn’t cut anything out of the film about it (that’s all Spielberg put in the film and there were no deleted scenes to add back into the film).

    Also, if Spielberg didn’t intend for David to be viewed as being capable of commiting suicide, then he never should have had the scenes of David choosing to fall into the ocean out of sadness and depression.
    However, he did include those scenes and it was that plotpoint that I felt were the most telling and important aspects of David’s character to the end of the story.

    Review by JasonN — April 23, 2008 @ 6:06 am

  4. Just watched this the other day, and I have to say, it was absolutely fantastic. You really made me do a complete 180 on a movie I used to hate.

    My only problems stem from the new plotline for Gigolo Joe.

    If Gigolo Joe is an illegal prostitute, then:

    - Why are the scientists at the beginning referencing shipping so many “pleasure models”?
    - Why, after he has sex with the woman, does he need to cut off his serial number? He hasn’t been doing anything he hasn’t done before – he should walk out, see the cop, turn around, and walk into the corner, whereupon it cuts to the next scene, establishing that the cops are looking for him because he’s doing something illegal without the confusing serial-number part.
    - Finally, Rouge City seems to be a city built around the idea of prostitute-bots, yet Joe is still arrested. This is less of a problem, but I have trouble believing a city infused with that much sexual innuendo would exist if prostitution was illegal (unless human prostitution is legal, but mecha prostitution isn’t).

    Other than that, and one or two near-insignificant sound jumps at edit points, it was perfect and I wouldn’t have known I was watching a fan edit instead of the real thing. Great work.

    Review by ChainsawAsh — November 20, 2008 @ 12:24 am

  5. ChainsawAsh:
    I was working on and have finished a 2.0 version of the edit which does reinstate the “Gigolo Joe Murder” subplot back into the film, with the exception that he never meets the killer in the edit (which he did in the original film). I do agree, having that subplot back in the story does do a lot more for Joe’s character and the plot works better with it.

    Review by JasonN — November 24, 2008 @ 3:27 am

  6. JasonN has not tried to be faithful to Kubrick’s intentions, which I think is a good thing. He has simply attempted to make a more watchable version of a very faulted movie. On the whole I think JasonN has succeeded.

    JasonN has created in my opinion a much better version than the theatrical release. It flowed and was quite entertaining. The problems with the original are still present in the FanEdit but to a lesser extent. I agree with all of the changes made by the FanEditor in context with this version of A.I.

    The ending is only slightly abrupt but very plausible as David has essentially given in to the human urges of jealousy and anger, so as a result commits a brutal act of robotic murder. As this is the case, he can just as easily feel the human emotions of depression or remorse and so end up killing himself. At the point at which he gains the irrational and illogical emotions so unique to the human, he has technically become one.

    I do have to ask; If David shows such an aptitude for violence would not the line of ‘David Super-Toys’ not have to be redesigned and the inventor’s reaction be one of dismay?

    I think if the very end had used some climactic music that reached a crescendo, rather than a fade-out in the middle of a piece of music, the ending would have more finality and not feel so uncertain. The idea works well, it just needs to be punctuated.

    So on the whole this is a very interesting FanEdit with it’s own story to tell. It is enjoyable and well made. The editing is faultless, as is the sound editing. The DVD is simple with a static menu.

    Entertainment 4 – Editing 5 – Audio – 5 – Presentation 3 = 4/5

    Review by Rock Savage — December 2, 2008 @ 1:00 pm

  7. by hcaulfield37:
    You guys realize that David kills himself at the end after spending the day with his mother. He didn’t dream. He shuts down and dies – happy ending? This ending depressed me.

    Still, this version is much better – I just feel the ending should have been kept on a bit.

    Review by boon23 — January 22, 2009 @ 1:38 am

  8. hcaulfield37: Eh, not terribly sure if you’re refering to the original Theatrical Cut, but David does not kill himself after his “perfect day” with Monica (or if that was the original intention of the scene, then it was grossly mishandled by Speilberg and his writting/editing)

    Review by JasonN — January 24, 2009 @ 5:59 am

  9. I’m fairly sure David doesn’t auto-shutdown at the end of the original film, thus killing himself.

    Jason – good call on reinserting the scene with Joe and the murder, makes more sense now.

    I do still maintain what I believe though – David is searching for the Blue Fairy, to be a real boy. He knows he is a robot, but is depressed to find he is one of a production line and hence throws himself into the sea.[and Jason's ending]

    But what I loved – was that David is plucked out of the sea by Joe and is angered, because he has found ‘Blue Fairy’. This is the first time in the film that we as the audience suddenly go ‘WTF?!’ We’ve been largely able to predict what was going on before this. We know Blue Fairy doesn’t exist and when David returns to the maker….we don’t know where we’re going next. A simple suicide feels like a bit of a let down, but the final twist as I’d like to call it – is David finds Blue Fairy! Of course, she turns out not to be real(but even we don’t know whats going on for a few minutes), but David doesn’t realise this – he thinks to all intents and purposes she is real. It ends his crusade properly. He chants, the camera pulls away and we get this wonderful speech by the narrator that ends with :

    “….and the Blue Fairy too,
    locking them together where he could still make her out – a
    blue ghost in ice – always there, always smiling, always
    awaiting him. Eventually he never moved at all, but his eyes
    always stayed open, staring ahead forever all through the
    darkness of each night, and the next day…and the next
    day…”

    I feel that that is the natural conclusion on this film – it concludes David’s quest and yes, is a bitter/sweet ending, but we do get some sort of resolution for David. This is a fairytale afterall……. ;-)

    Review by white43 — February 9, 2009 @ 1:25 pm

  10. white43:
    Just because this story is a Fairy Tale, I don’t feel that means that the story needs to have a “glimmer of hope/light/good” at the end: for me, I felt that part of the message that the story of AI was trying to tell was that an indiviual shouldn’t try to be something that he was never intended to be, but rather to accept himself/herself for who he/she truly is. In the case of David, he couldn’t accept that he would never be a real human (and that his “mother” would never truly love him) and, because he could never obtain something that was never a possibility for him in the first place, he chose to end his existence.

    Fairy tales are meant to teach children (and even adults) the nature of life and growing up – sometimes those lessons needs to have a harsh or negative edge to them to make the point across.
    If you remember correctly, the original version of “Red Riding Hood” ends not with the Hunter slaying the Wolf… but with the Wolf devouring the Girl.

    Review by JasonN — March 23, 2009 @ 6:19 am

  11. This is good work (I refer to V2, I havne’t seen V1).

    The tone seems right now that the film as been freed of most of Speilberg’s treacle, tonally more what I think Kubrick might have come up with. The storytelling is mostly tight and obviously a lot of thought went into this edit.

    Technically it’s good, too.

    I have to agree with White43 about the too-abrupt ending, however. A much more fitting but equally downbeat ending would have been David underwater in the helicopter, with his imaginary Blue Fairy at last.

    How about a V3? Only joking :)

    SD

    Review by spicediver — May 5, 2009 @ 11:42 am

  12. JasonN has not tried to be faithful to Kubrick’s intentions, which I think is a good thing. He has simply attempted to make a more watchable version of a very faulted movie. On the whole I think JasonN has succeeded.

    He has created in my opinion a much better version than the theatrical release. It flows and is quite entertaining. The problems with the original are still present in the FanEdit but to a lesser extent. I agree with all of the changes made by the FanEditor in context with this version of A.I.

    The ending is only slightly abrupt but very plausible as David has essentially given in to the human urges of jealousy and anger, so as a result commits a brutal act of robotic murder. As this is the case, he can just as easily feel the human emotions of depression or remorse and so end up killing himself. At the point at which he gains the irrational and illogical emotions so unique to the human, he has technically become one.

    I do have to ask; If David shows such an aptitude for violence would not the line of ‘David Super-Toys’ not have to be redesigned and the inventor’s reaction be one of dismay?

    I think if the very end had used some climactic music that reached a crescendo, rather than a fade-out in the middle of a piece of music, the ending would have more finality and not feel so uncertain. The idea works well, it just needs to be punctuated.

    So on the whole this is a very interesting FanEdit with it’s own story to tell. It is enjoyable and well made. The editing is faultless, as is the sound editing. The DVD is simple with a static menu.

    8/10

    Review by Rock Savage — June 16, 2009 @ 5:54 pm

  13. I liked the film but even I felt the fade out of the score in the end is making the ending abrupt. You need to continue the score while fading to white with credits rolling. overall 7.5 out of 10.

    Review by Nishit_Singh — December 8, 2009 @ 5:36 pm

  14. I didn’t like the ending…. you could extend it a little bit where David is underwater in the helicopter, with his imaginary Blue Fairy. Please could you try fixing the ending. You know you can do it.

    Review by Nishit_Singh — December 8, 2009 @ 5:53 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a REVIEW:

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Theme by boon23, powered by WordPress

Superman Pictures (except for Superman Returns: Copyright CapedWonder.com; Bowers Imagineering; Warner Bros; and DC Comics. All Rights Reserved 2006. Used by permission from Jim Bowers. Visitors to the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites are advised that all fanedits contained within the pages of the websites are believed to be fanedits and/or preservation projects of films from personal collections which fall under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include— 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Since fanedits contained here are mainly created out of criticisms, research, and are completely nonprofit, we here at the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites believe that they fall under the requirements of the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107. However, no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information are made. Visitors are encouraged to review the official version of all documents upon which they plan to download as well as to make completely sure they own a legitimate, original copy of anything they may wish to download. The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites cannot give this permission. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Links to Other Sites - Some of the linked sites are not under the control of the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites. Therefore, the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websitesmake no representations concerning their content, and are not responsible for their content. That the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites have provided a link to a site is not an endorsement, or an indication of affiliation with the owners or publishers of any fanedits and all related materials. There are risks in using any information, services or fanedits found on the Internet via any outside links; and the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites caution you to make sure that you completely understand these risks before retrieving, using, relying upon, or downloading anything via the Internet. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Members, Fanedits and Links The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites reserves the right to refuse services at any time. Notification that Information Provided by You is Public Information Any information provided by you to the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites, including but not limited to feedback, questions, comments, suggestions, download links, etc., etc., are considered non-confidential since it is a public website; moreover, such information is a public record subject to public inspection pursuant to law. The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites has no obligation of any kind with respect to such information and cannot be held responsible for the decisions nor the actions of any individuals of the entire Internet community at large. By downloading any fanedit, the downloader assumes all responsibilities thereof as well as all the consequences that may incur. CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED!




http://fanedit.org/feed/http://fanedit.org/comments/feed/