Fanedit.org FanEditForum AvP's Gallery
Shop Chatroom Website Status
 
Skip to header | Skip to content
FANEDIT.ORG - HOME OF THE FANEDITS
SOME OF THE BEST PREQUELS TO CURRENT BLOCKBUSTERS FANEDITS:
Transformers - Resparked by Reave Terminator 3 - T-Hope Edition Harry Potter and the order of the Phoenix Extended Edition by ADigitalMan X-Men: Requiem War by Wraith Indiana Jones & The Last Crusade: Unholy Edition: By Infodroid Fanedit Contest May 2009 Winner
SPAWN OF FRANKENSTEIN: Remixed by Jorge

by Jorge

What is it about? This remix of FRANKENSTEIN and BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN aims for a serious tone by removing all comedy relief, not humanizing the Monster and having a darker ending.

member ratings: 9 votes, average: 6.89 out of 109 votes, average: 6.89 out of 109 votes, average: 6.89 out of 109 votes, average: 6.89 out of 109 votes, average: 6.89 out of 109 votes, average: 6.89 out of 109 votes, average: 6.89 out of 109 votes, average: 6.89 out of 109 votes, average: 6.89 out of 109 votes, average: 6.89 out of 10 (9 votes, average: 6.89 out of 10)
You need to be a registered member to rate this post.
Loading ... Loading ...

original film name: remix of FRANKENSTEIN and BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN.
film studio name: Universal Studios
Original Film Released: FRANKENSTEIN (1931) and BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN (1935)
Fan Edit Released: December, 2008
Original Runtime: FRANKENSTEIN 71 mins. BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN 75 mins.
New Runtime: 93 min
Amount of time Cut/Added:

  • - reformatted entire film to 1:85:1 and manually recomposed entire film.
  • - Color treated entire film for a new look.
  • - new opening title scene.
  • - added new score to most of FRANKENSTEIN.
  • - trimmed most scenes for pace.
  • - Re-cut little Maria’s scene.
  • - deleted Mary Shelly opening from BOF. Now the films just continues.
  • - deleted most of Minnie - Housekeeper. No comedy relief.
  • - deleted sheepherder girl rescue and Blind hermit cabin. No humanizing the creature.
  • - As usual for my remixes… no happy ending.

DVD - Features:

  • Menus 16.9
  • Scene Selection Menus
  • presented in 1:85:1
  • Bonus trailers

Concept: FRANKENSTEIN is a brilliant film. Decades ahead of it’s time. Karloff portrayal of the Monster is visceral and vicious.
However the sequel BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN changed all that. they succeeded in humanizing the monster. He now emotes and has pathos. For his sins he is crucified and thrown into a dungeon. cries because he wants a friend, falls in love and has his heart broken. Add to this the comedy relief of Minnie the Housekeeper and the Burgomaster and the sequel loses it for me. So the attempt is to streamline both films together while keeping the flavor of the original.



PROJECT TIME:

planning: did it as i went.
editing: 3 months.
sound editing: see above.
DVD layout and features: 1 week.

Buy the original DVDs and support FANEDIT.ORG:

Images:
art by jorge (download here):


Faneditforum Link

Disclaimer: You must own the original movie before acquiring any FanEdited movie. We here at FanEdit.org respect the company’s copyrights, and don’t want to infringe on any company’s rights. Thank you, FE!

Maybe downloadable from Fanedit.info through Rapidshare (enter and download at your own risk and responsibility)

Filed under: Horror, Jorge, True Fanedits /

4 Comments »

  1. Jorge strikes again!

    Only a certain few editors out there can be successful at taking two film classics and combining them into one feature, while being creative enough to give their own additions and alter the plot without ruining the film. Jorge is such an editor.

    Here we take the classic of Frankenstein and truly show him for what he is, not an unfortunate, misunderstood creature, but the vicious terrorizing the country side monster he should have been. You no longer feel any remorse for this undead monster and it was very refreshing to treat him as such.

    Adding to this is the nice transition and combination of using Bride of Frankenstein to bridge the gap and give you a true full feature while still retaining the nasty elements of the monster that is portrayed in this edit.

    The video was color treated and now gives the film an actual finer detail and brownish, sepia tone. In fact I prefer this more than the original black and white. It truly adds a “murky” overall feeling to the film.

    My only real compliant is the newer score pieces that were added in. Let me be clear now and say that they do fit the scenes they are supposed to be representing. However they are also very clean sounding and do not match the overall older audio and picture feel that you are viewing. Perhaps if the added audio were given a filter to “age” it a bit so it jives more in place. As it stands now the newer audio drastically sticks out and this kind of ruins the overall feel it should be giving you because of it. Not really a major issue, but it did distract me a little.

    Without giving away too much more, I strongly recommend this edit for film classic connoisseurs and horror fans alike.

    4 out of 5 stars. This easily would have been 5 stars if it were not for my slight disagreement with the newer audio

    One of the best parts not having to do with the edit was the lovely trailer for his “Behemoth” edit which hopefully will be coming out soon. Considering I completely do not acknowledge one of the films used in it, Jorge once again might be able to pull off the impossible..

    The dvd has very nice live menus and some bonus trailer material

    Get this edit now!!!

    Comment by tranzor — December 22, 2008 @ 3:26 am

  2. First of all, let me say “thank you, Jorge” for bringing back such beautiful classics and creating a fanedit from them.
    It was well worth the watch.

    contains heavy spoilers

    please note that this review is just my personal opinion.

    video editing: As usual for Jorge’s edits, the editing was done perfectly. The sepia coloring adds to the atmosphere.
    An incredible lot was done to both movies and I can only assume how long it must have taken to create them. The reformatting to 1.85:1 was masterfully achieved and the movie looked as if it had always been intended to look like that.
    The new opening with the green titles was first a bit of confusing, as it presented the movie a lot more modern than it actually was, because the sepia effect made it rather appear older. Still it looked really great. The trimming was done really well, one very long blending transition in the Pretorius speech felt a bit artificial as did a few others, as they were too perfect, when the actual movie comes with loads of what was common for that time: too fast movements, stuttering, artificial backgrounds, artificial objects (like the cemetery in the beginning that is stuffed with ridiculous objects).
    The actor change of Elisabeth was about as confusing as the actor change for the oracle in the Matrix sequels, but Jorge could not do anything about it (why did the producers not at least let her have the same hair style and color one might wonder).
    The story flows really well and it even kind of makes sense that a mad scientist like Dr. Pretorius could tame the creature a bit. The passing of time was a bit confusing though, as I never really knew how many days, weeks, months had actually passed. The movies were very well joined and especially “Bride” was edited to the better in my opinion. The all destructive lever is one of the most stupid ideas I have ever seem in a movie, yet it kind of did the job: no happy ending. (btw. as for the cast: Elsa Lancaster as Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley is The Monster’s Mate).
    The original Frankenstein on the other hand was missing the emotional depth by making the monster just a monster without any other feelings but hate and the wish to destroy. For the later character development in Bride this part would have still been worthy to include. As it is now, the characters are a bit too one-dimensional. Besides that the story was well development and left no plot holes. The landscape that is shown when the monster is killing Little Maria was a bit not fitting to the style of the movie, even though it was repeated for one shot in Bride and from my feelings it reminded me a lot on what I felt in Jorge’s Kill Bill X fanedit, when Beatrix shoots the little girl (which is actually a nice trademark for an editor to have a consistent style over the years).
    so, even though it was not 100% consistent to me, I cannot give anything else but: 5 of 5 stars for editing.

    video quality: perfect. I noticed 2 times slight interlacing stripes though. 5 of 5

    audio editing: consistency is an issue here to me. Sound levels, transitions, synchronicity were all perfect. The choice of additional music though was in my opinion not, but most of all just for the Frankenstein part. Bride was perfect. In the first 50 minutes of the movie, the styles of music change quite drastically from classic to almost modern. But the problem is more the technical quality. The new music came crystal clear, whereas the classic music was scratchy, overdubbed and lacked bass. Same goes for a few added sound effects that were crystal clear, while all the original ones were scratchy and old. Now don’t get me wrong, it was great to see the monster hunt to Bram Stoker’s Dracula score, but it was inconsistent. If it had been possible to keep to one style or quality the audio would have worked better for me.
    resulting in a 4 of 5 for audio editing from me (3 for Frankenstein and 5 for Bride).

    entertainment: Was it better than the original? No. But that was not what this edit was made for. It was an all new watching experience of Frankenstein and as that it worked really well and kept me well entertained for most parts. I do not at all regret watching it and might even watch it again sometimes.
    4 of 5 for entertainment.

    presentation: the presentation is simply put: awesome. Great menus, fantastic trailers. Nice cover art. The scene selection is the usual Jorge DVD style and pretty boring and not informative at all, as you get just numbers without any further clue. Still: I wish all fanedits could be presented as nicely as this one.
    5 of 5 stars for presentation.

    resulting in a 5 of 5 stars from me for this fanedit. Mission accomplished. Really well done.

    Epilogue:
    This is not the best fanedit I have ever watched, but it is great for what it is: a revival of the classic Frankenstein. I like it and can recommend it to anyone who has a heart for the good old stuff. To me it is an addition to the original Frankenstein, which I still find unsurpassed. And a definite improvement over “Bride Of Frankenstein”, which I will probably not watch again, but rather this one.

    Comment by boon23 — December 22, 2008 @ 6:02 am

  3. Spawn Of Frankenstein - Remixed by Jorge

    Unfortunately, after much anticipation this FanEdit simply failed to work for me on any level.

    Contains Spoilers!!!!

    First, the opening credits are completely out of keeping with the feel of the original source material. Bright green text over a sepia montage just feels odd and plainly wrong…. and why the need for the axing and mutilation of a cows head? What does that have to do with the creation of a monster or any of the themes presented in Frankenstein? To me this felt gratuitous in the extreme and totally out of keeping.

    Also the music was poorly selected and integrated. Mostly it consists of music cues that are obviously from a more modern era and so they feel far too clean when compared with the later Franz Waxman score that dominates Bride Of Frankenstein in the second half. These new cues are also too low in the mix when compared with the later original score and no effort has been made to distress them. I think sticking to the same composer’s works or at least the same era would have helped with over-all continuity of the FanEdit.

    The sepia look of the film works well but I did notice quite a lot of inter-lacing particularly in the action scenes or with fast movement.

    The new editing during the creation of the Monster during the electrical storm was done very well but feels too frenetic and MTV when compared with the pace of the editing that proceeded it. Less rapid cutting would have again helped with an over-all continuity of the FanEdit.

    Another concern was that the FanEdit appeared to be flipped horizontally. With my DVD’s of the originals the action takes place in the opposite direction. I am not sure if this was done purposely by the FanEditor or is a fault of different DVD versions but it feels like looking at a photograph of a loved one but seeing that familiar mole on wrong cheek.

    I can tell a lot of work went into this FanEdit and I am sure that some will enjoy the anachronistic update but it utterly failed for me. It is distracting, awkward and disappointing almost on every level. I will stick with the originals and all their raw naivety.

    The DVD is well presented visually but I was put off by the cheesy 80’s type rock music selected for the opening menu. A total misfire for creating any atmosphere for the feature FanEdit that follows. The scene selection menu looks unfinished.

    Entertainment 2 - Editing 2 - Audio 1 - DVD Presentation - 1

    1/5

    Comment by Rock Savage — December 27, 2008 @ 6:15 pm

  4. Great edit. My only problem deals with the passing of time between the two movies, but it’s done well enough.
    I like the new music and the animated menu is great fun.
    It’s a 4/5, could have been 5 if the transition between the 2 movies had flowed better to me.

    Comment by TMBTM — January 6, 2009 @ 2:23 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • 1
  • ...
  • ...
  • 0


Theme by boon23, powered by WordPress

Superman Pictures (except for Superman Returns: Copyright CapedWonder.com; Bowers Imagineering; Warner Bros; and DC Comics. All Rights Reserved 2006. Used by permission from Jim Bowers. Visitors to the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites are advised that all fanedits contained within the pages of the websites are believed to be fanedits and/or preservation projects of films from personal collections which fall under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include— 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Since fanedits contained here are mainly created out of criticisms, research, and are completely nonprofit, we here at the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites believe that they fall under the requirements of the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107. However, no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information are made. Visitors are encouraged to review the official version of all documents upon which they plan to download as well as to make completely sure they own a legitimate, original copy of anything they may wish to download. The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites cannot give this permission. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Links to Other Sites - Some of the linked sites are not under the control of the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites. Therefore, the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websitesmake no representations concerning their content, and are not responsible for their content. That the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites have provided a link to a site is not an endorsement, or an indication of affiliation with the owners or publishers of any fanedits and all related materials. There are risks in using any information, services or fanedits found on the Internet via any outside links; and the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites caution you to make sure that you completely understand these risks before retrieving, using, relying upon, or downloading anything via the Internet. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Members, Fanedits and Links The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites reserves the right to refuse services at any time. Notification that Information Provided by You is Public Information Any information provided by you to the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites, including but not limited to feedback, questions, comments, suggestions, download links, etc., etc., are considered non-confidential since it is a public website; moreover, such information is a public record subject to public inspection pursuant to law. The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites has no obligation of any kind with respect to such information and cannot be held responsible for the decisions nor the actions of any individuals of the entire Internet community at large. By downloading any fanedit, the downloader assumes all responsibilities thereof as well as all the consequences that may incur. CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED!