<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Die Hard 2: Terror Storm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fanedit.org/5511/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fanedit.org/5511/</link>
	<description>The wonderful world of movies - edited by fans for fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neglify</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/5511/comment-page-1/#comment-12111</link>
		<dc:creator>Neglify</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=5511#comment-12111</guid>
		<description>Damn, this was a good edit!

Audio/Visual - 10
Editing - 10
Entertainment - 8 (Versus a 5 for the original Die Hard 2)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, this was a good edit!</p>
<p>Audio/Visual &#8211; 10<br />
Editing &#8211; 10<br />
Entertainment &#8211; 8 (Versus a 5 for the original Die Hard 2)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeppelinrox</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/5511/comment-page-1/#comment-10853</link>
		<dc:creator>zeppelinrox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=5511#comment-10853</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m alway happy to watch a fanedit without technical glitches and this is very well done indeed.
I haven&#039;t watched the original in years and I didn&#039;t really notice anything missing, 
I only just now read the changes made and I can see that Elbarto1 made some great editing decisions.

9/10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m alway happy to watch a fanedit without technical glitches and this is very well done indeed.<br />
I haven&#8217;t watched the original in years and I didn&#8217;t really notice anything missing,<br />
I only just now read the changes made and I can see that Elbarto1 made some great editing decisions.</p>
<p>9/10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joebshmoe</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/5511/comment-page-1/#comment-10356</link>
		<dc:creator>joebshmoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=5511#comment-10356</guid>
		<description>yes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boon23</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/5511/comment-page-1/#comment-9720</link>
		<dc:creator>boon23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 13:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=5511#comment-9720</guid>
		<description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 150%; line-height: normal;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff8000;&quot;&gt;Die Hard 2 - Terror Storm by Elbarto1&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff0000;&quot;&gt;review by boon23&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff8000;&quot;&gt;Prologue:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
For completion of the series I once bought DH2, but must confess that I haven&#039;t watched it in years. Until DH4 this was to me the worst part of the series, created by one of my least favorite directors (and unforgettable killer of Carolco) Renny Harlin. I think whatever he touches becomes superficial. So it was a welcome ooprtunity to watch it again with a fresh mind and, well, some expectations, because of Elbarto&#039;s first and well done fanedit: Running Scared - True Crime Edition.

&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff0000;&quot;&gt;As for all my reviews: this is just my personal opinion of this fanedit. I cannot tell anybody else, if he or she will experience it in the same way or the opposite. So my review is not objective and does not reflect the opinion of fanedit.org.&lt;/span&gt;

!!!!This review contains heavy spoilers!!!

&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff8000;&quot;&gt;The edit:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
It was nice after some years to meet with the young John McClane again and to watch an action movie from 1990. I know, I enjoyed this edit a lot more than the original with this annoying reporter. All the changes were very well executed and are not noticeable. And they all serve the greater good of this movie. It&#039;s still not a masterpiece, but for what it is, it&#039;s the best version of Die Hard 2 I have ever watched and if I have to watch it again, it would be without a doubt, this fanedit.
So far, so good, BUT there is still a lot that I don&#039;t like about this movie, especially the over-the-top scenes and the unbelievable parts. So they are on an airport with hundreds of people working there and it always is John McClane and John McClane alone, who does the cool stuff? What are the other guys doing all the time? What&#039;s so hard about putting some electric light to guide the planes or at least help them a bit? Where is the airport staff? Why don&#039;t they line up cars?
The sequel to Die Hard was supposed to put John McClane into another situation where he is the lonesome cowboy, but with the airport they really picked a stupid idea to make that happen.
As for this fanedit, I would have loved it,if it went further and some more stuff got deleted, for example John McClane waving the torches, before the plane blows up and various other stuff.
The already mentioned inconsistency about the terrorists being known to Holly is true.
Still this was a vast improvement over the original and shoudl be ackowledged as that: the best version of Die Hard 2 ever available.
&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #80ff00;&quot;&gt;editing: 9 of 10,&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;color: #80ff00;&quot;&gt;entertainment: 7 of 10 (original 5 of 10)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff8000;&quot;&gt;Image and video quality:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
The video quality suffers a bit from a slight stutter in camera drives. Other than that it is perfect. Image quality is sharp and colorful. Very well preserved.
&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #80ff00;&quot;&gt;Video quality: 9 of 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff8000;&quot;&gt;Audio editing and audio quality:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
The audio editing was perfect. I did not notice anything disturbing. Sound quality is great.
&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #80ff00;&quot;&gt;audio editing: 10 of 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #80ff00;&quot;&gt;sound quality: 10 of 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff8000;&quot;&gt;presentation:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
This fanedit comes with a nice animated menu, beautifully animated scene selection and good cover art. The movie credits were partly self created (which unfortunately shows a few times through change of font, but is not too distracting). There is no additional bonus material.
DVD menus: 9 of 10, cover art 9 of 10, extras: 0 of 10, existence of menus, chapters and cover art: 10 of 10

This results in a &lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #80ff00;&quot;&gt;7 of 10 rating from me for presentation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;.

&lt;span style=&quot;color: #80ff00;&quot;&gt;Final result: &lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 150%; line-height: normal;&quot;&gt;8 of 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (if you sum up the numbers you&#039;ll get to 9 of 10, but as it is my mean style I never differ more than 1 star from my entertainment of the main feature, which is good for fanedits with a very bad presentation, but high entertainment, and bad for fanedits with incredible presentation and editing quality, but a lack of entertainment).
Recommended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 150%; line-height: normal;"><span style="color: #ff8000;">Die Hard 2 &#8211; Terror Storm by Elbarto1</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">review by boon23</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #ff8000;">Prologue:</span></span><br />
For completion of the series I once bought DH2, but must confess that I haven&#8217;t watched it in years. Until DH4 this was to me the worst part of the series, created by one of my least favorite directors (and unforgettable killer of Carolco) Renny Harlin. I think whatever he touches becomes superficial. So it was a welcome ooprtunity to watch it again with a fresh mind and, well, some expectations, because of Elbarto&#8217;s first and well done fanedit: Running Scared &#8211; True Crime Edition.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;">As for all my reviews: this is just my personal opinion of this fanedit. I cannot tell anybody else, if he or she will experience it in the same way or the opposite. So my review is not objective and does not reflect the opinion of fanedit.org.</span></p>
<p>!!!!This review contains heavy spoilers!!!</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #ff8000;">The edit:</span></span><br />
It was nice after some years to meet with the young John McClane again and to watch an action movie from 1990. I know, I enjoyed this edit a lot more than the original with this annoying reporter. All the changes were very well executed and are not noticeable. And they all serve the greater good of this movie. It&#8217;s still not a masterpiece, but for what it is, it&#8217;s the best version of Die Hard 2 I have ever watched and if I have to watch it again, it would be without a doubt, this fanedit.<br />
So far, so good, BUT there is still a lot that I don&#8217;t like about this movie, especially the over-the-top scenes and the unbelievable parts. So they are on an airport with hundreds of people working there and it always is John McClane and John McClane alone, who does the cool stuff? What are the other guys doing all the time? What&#8217;s so hard about putting some electric light to guide the planes or at least help them a bit? Where is the airport staff? Why don&#8217;t they line up cars?<br />
The sequel to Die Hard was supposed to put John McClane into another situation where he is the lonesome cowboy, but with the airport they really picked a stupid idea to make that happen.<br />
As for this fanedit, I would have loved it,if it went further and some more stuff got deleted, for example John McClane waving the torches, before the plane blows up and various other stuff.<br />
The already mentioned inconsistency about the terrorists being known to Holly is true.<br />
Still this was a vast improvement over the original and shoudl be ackowledged as that: the best version of Die Hard 2 ever available.<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #80ff00;">editing: 9 of 10,</span><br />
<span style="color: #80ff00;">entertainment: 7 of 10 (original 5 of 10)</span></span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><br />
<span style="color: #ff8000;">Image and video quality:</span></span><br />
The video quality suffers a bit from a slight stutter in camera drives. Other than that it is perfect. Image quality is sharp and colorful. Very well preserved.<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #80ff00;">Video quality: 9 of 10</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #ff8000;">Audio editing and audio quality:</span></span><br />
The audio editing was perfect. I did not notice anything disturbing. Sound quality is great.<br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #80ff00;">audio editing: 10 of 10</span></span><br />
<span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #80ff00;">sound quality: 10 of 10</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #ff8000;">presentation:</span></span><br />
This fanedit comes with a nice animated menu, beautifully animated scene selection and good cover art. The movie credits were partly self created (which unfortunately shows a few times through change of font, but is not too distracting). There is no additional bonus material.<br />
DVD menus: 9 of 10, cover art 9 of 10, extras: 0 of 10, existence of menus, chapters and cover art: 10 of 10</p>
<p>This results in a <span style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="color: #80ff00;">7 of 10 rating from me for presentation</span></span>.</p>
<p><span style="color: #80ff00;">Final result: <span style="font-size: 150%; line-height: normal;">8 of 10</span></span> (if you sum up the numbers you&#8217;ll get to 9 of 10, but as it is my mean style I never differ more than 1 star from my entertainment of the main feature, which is good for fanedits with a very bad presentation, but high entertainment, and bad for fanedits with incredible presentation and editing quality, but a lack of entertainment).<br />
Recommended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elbarto1</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/5511/comment-page-1/#comment-9617</link>
		<dc:creator>elbarto1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=5511#comment-9617</guid>
		<description>to oknihcap - first off, thanks for taking the time to watch, I am glad you enjoyed my version! As far as the inconsistancy, I suppose you are right however I just chalked it up to the comment made in the tower that &quot;many planes had airphones and we got through to them&quot; as well as the tower being able to communicate the situation to the planes via the outer marker beacon. Whether or not she knew it, people on the plane did. Couple this with the fact that holly asks the stewardess about not having enough fuel and the fact that hat shes a bright lady and I felt it was enough of a leap since they just landed using a trail of fire and were evacuating the plane w/ the inflatable slide.  I guess I can just easily imagine/speculate her overhearing something like &quot;theres terrorists at the airport&quot;. Regardless, its something I can live with considering I removed all of her &quot;empowered woman&quot; scenes on the plane. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to oknihcap &#8211; first off, thanks for taking the time to watch, I am glad you enjoyed my version! As far as the inconsistancy, I suppose you are right however I just chalked it up to the comment made in the tower that &#8220;many planes had airphones and we got through to them&#8221; as well as the tower being able to communicate the situation to the planes via the outer marker beacon. Whether or not she knew it, people on the plane did. Couple this with the fact that holly asks the stewardess about not having enough fuel and the fact that hat shes a bright lady and I felt it was enough of a leap since they just landed using a trail of fire and were evacuating the plane w/ the inflatable slide.  I guess I can just easily imagine/speculate her overhearing something like &#8220;theres terrorists at the airport&#8221;. Regardless, its something I can live with considering I removed all of her &#8220;empowered woman&#8221; scenes on the plane. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oknihcap</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/5511/comment-page-1/#comment-9616</link>
		<dc:creator>oknihcap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=5511#comment-9616</guid>
		<description>I found this a very well done fanedit. The cuts were indeed seamless, and the removal of Dick Thornberg was a great decision, and helped the film immensely. Also loved the smaller cuts as well, including some of the cheesier lines. Often times, I&#039;m not a fan of removing scenes, preferring additional scenes added or extended cuts if anything. However, this is a case where the cuts definitely helped the movie. Video quality was excellent, as well as the menus. A very well put together job.

I did notice one possible inconsistency created by the removal of Dick Thornberg, though. Since he was removed, the people on Holly&#039;s plane are not aware of the terrorist situation, because Dick did not create the panic by alerting everybody as to what he discovered. However, as Holly is exiting the plane at the end, she still makes the comment to John, &quot;They told me there were terorists!&quot;. But she should not have been aware of that because of the removal of Dick Thornberg. She should be more or less clueless about what was really happening. Please correct me if I am mistaken. I imagine that to correct this inconsistency, that line would just need to be cut out. 

Overall, an excellent fanedit that is now my preferred version for Die Hard 2. Great work!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this a very well done fanedit. The cuts were indeed seamless, and the removal of Dick Thornberg was a great decision, and helped the film immensely. Also loved the smaller cuts as well, including some of the cheesier lines. Often times, I&#8217;m not a fan of removing scenes, preferring additional scenes added or extended cuts if anything. However, this is a case where the cuts definitely helped the movie. Video quality was excellent, as well as the menus. A very well put together job.</p>
<p>I did notice one possible inconsistency created by the removal of Dick Thornberg, though. Since he was removed, the people on Holly&#8217;s plane are not aware of the terrorist situation, because Dick did not create the panic by alerting everybody as to what he discovered. However, as Holly is exiting the plane at the end, she still makes the comment to John, &#8220;They told me there were terorists!&#8221;. But she should not have been aware of that because of the removal of Dick Thornberg. She should be more or less clueless about what was really happening. Please correct me if I am mistaken. I imagine that to correct this inconsistency, that line would just need to be cut out. </p>
<p>Overall, an excellent fanedit that is now my preferred version for Die Hard 2. Great work!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThrowgnCpr</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/5511/comment-page-1/#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator>ThrowgnCpr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=5511#comment-9594</guid>
		<description>Its been a long time since watching Die Hard 2 prior to this edit. It probably wasnt long after the movie was released. I remember enjoying the film for the most part, but didn&#039;t really remember much, aside from some scenes that were memorable to me for some reason (throat slashing in truck, icicle in the eye &amp; magazines full of blanks). I was pretty excited to watch this edit, with no expectations. After I started the DVD, the movie stylings of the late 80s and early 90s started to rush back to me. I could tell, why I didn&#039;t remember the movie that well.

The editing here was VERY well done. No hard cuts whatsoever, and I could not tell that this had been fanedited (especially since I have not seen the movie in a while). The removal of William Atherton&#039;s character was a great move. I would have liked to have seen a few more cheezy lines gone. Especially from Denis Franz&#039;s character, and the janitor guy, but all in all, great job in toning down some cheese, and tightening it up.
&lt;span style=&quot;color: #00ff00;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Editing: 10 of 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;color: #00ff00;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Entertainment: 7 of 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 85%; line-height: normal;&quot;&gt;and after realizing what has been removed, I would probably rate the original a 5 or 6 now. So while this is still no masterpiece, its a fun action crime flick. For those of you that are really into this genre, you will get a big kick out of it&lt;/span&gt;)

&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff8000;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Image &amp; Video Quality&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
Image quality was great.  The additions to the credits were really nice too, and it looked like they were a part of the original
&lt;span style=&quot;color: #00ff00;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Video Quality: 10 of 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff8000;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Audio Editing &amp; Audio Quality&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
It was seamless to me. I could not hear any hard cuts at all, and it sounded fine on my system (which is just a stereo system, so I never get too anal about surround).
&lt;span style=&quot;color: #00ff00;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Audio Quality: 10 of 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;color: #00ff00;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Audio Editing: 10 of 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;color: #ff8000;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Presentation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
Cool DVD. It comes with menu transitions, and animated menus. Nice work. We also get another elbarto1 DVD cover. No DVD extras, but everything else was great
&lt;span style=&quot;color: #00ff00;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Presentation: 9 of 10&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span style=&quot;color: #00ff00;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Final Result: &lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 150%; line-height: normal;&quot;&gt;9 of 10&lt;/span&gt; for me&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
A cool watch for me, and I could not tell at all that this was a fanedit. So, as I mentioned above, as this is still no masterpiece, I think it is really well done, and it is an improvement over the original. I will happily watch elbarto1&#039;s fanedits in the future &lt;img title=&quot;Smile&quot; src=&quot;http://www.faneditforum.com/images/smilies/Yellow_Flash_Colorz_PDT_15.gif&quot; alt=&quot;:)&quot; /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its been a long time since watching Die Hard 2 prior to this edit. It probably wasnt long after the movie was released. I remember enjoying the film for the most part, but didn&#8217;t really remember much, aside from some scenes that were memorable to me for some reason (throat slashing in truck, icicle in the eye &amp; magazines full of blanks). I was pretty excited to watch this edit, with no expectations. After I started the DVD, the movie stylings of the late 80s and early 90s started to rush back to me. I could tell, why I didn&#8217;t remember the movie that well.</p>
<p>The editing here was VERY well done. No hard cuts whatsoever, and I could not tell that this had been fanedited (especially since I have not seen the movie in a while). The removal of William Atherton&#8217;s character was a great move. I would have liked to have seen a few more cheezy lines gone. Especially from Denis Franz&#8217;s character, and the janitor guy, but all in all, great job in toning down some cheese, and tightening it up.<br />
<span style="color: #00ff00;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Editing: 10 of 10</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #00ff00;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Entertainment: 7 of 10</span></span> (<span style="font-size: 85%; line-height: normal;">and after realizing what has been removed, I would probably rate the original a 5 or 6 now. So while this is still no masterpiece, its a fun action crime flick. For those of you that are really into this genre, you will get a big kick out of it</span>)</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff8000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Image &amp; Video Quality</span></span><br />
Image quality was great.  The additions to the credits were really nice too, and it looked like they were a part of the original<br />
<span style="color: #00ff00;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Video Quality: 10 of 10</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff8000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Audio Editing &amp; Audio Quality</span></span><br />
It was seamless to me. I could not hear any hard cuts at all, and it sounded fine on my system (which is just a stereo system, so I never get too anal about surround).<br />
<span style="color: #00ff00;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Audio Quality: 10 of 10</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #00ff00;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Audio Editing: 10 of 10</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff8000;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Presentation</span></span><br />
Cool DVD. It comes with menu transitions, and animated menus. Nice work. We also get another elbarto1 DVD cover. No DVD extras, but everything else was great<br />
<span style="color: #00ff00;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Presentation: 9 of 10</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #00ff00;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Final Result: <span style="font-size: 150%; line-height: normal;">9 of 10</span> for me</span></span><br />
A cool watch for me, and I could not tell at all that this was a fanedit. So, as I mentioned above, as this is still no masterpiece, I think it is really well done, and it is an improvement over the original. I will happily watch elbarto1&#8217;s fanedits in the future <img title="Smile" src="http://www.faneditforum.com/images/smilies/Yellow_Flash_Colorz_PDT_15.gif" alt=":)" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StarShipMagneto</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/5511/comment-page-1/#comment-9583</link>
		<dc:creator>StarShipMagneto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=5511#comment-9583</guid>
		<description>Great edit, I enjoyed it alot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great edit, I enjoyed it alot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
