<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eleven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fanedit.org/687/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fanedit.org/687/</link>
	<description>The wonderful world of movies - edited by fans for fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sdavmor</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/687/comment-page-1/#comment-11227</link>
		<dc:creator>sdavmor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=687#comment-11227</guid>
		<description>My cousin and I watched &quot;Capricorn One&quot; and &quot;Eleven&quot; back-to-back the other night. Conclusions: &quot;Eleven&quot; is a better film&quot;, but the problem is that Mollo has (for the most part) polished a turd to a high-sheen.  Which is all down to problems in the source material rather than the fan-editing. I was impressed by the excellent informative fan-editor commentary track, which helped a lot in understanding the choices made in what to junk from &quot;Capricorn One&quot;.

The editing of &quot;Eleven&quot; (with the added footage) is excellent, and some of the continuity repair-work + audio reconstruction is outstanding. I especially liked how a lot of needless exposition was got rid of.  That by itself (trimming a good 20 mins of yakking) was a huge improvement  to the flow of the story.

One thing that I noted watching the original is that the premise of &quot;Capricorn One&quot; is very strong. It&#039;s ultra-suspicious conspiratorial core almost carries a duff script and a bunch of so-so performances to the finish line.  Which is probably why its a dynamite candidate for a get-it-right remake (one is in the works right now).

Once the decision was made to junk the entire WTF? crop-dusting biplane rescue the ending of &quot;Eleven&quot; has to change from exposure of the conspiracy to its triumph. I think Mollo might have been a bit too aggressive in cutting Elliott Gould&#039;s part.  And Karen Black&#039;s reporter did at least serve as a mechanism for getting him pointed towards the conspiracy&#039;s film-studio in the abandoned airbase. Still, this is just personal taste nit-picking. A very good job indeed, Mollo.  You achieved all your stated objectives, even if the final result is still a bit of a letdown in the conspiracy-thriller dept.

I give it 8/10 for execution and 6/10 for content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My cousin and I watched &#8220;Capricorn One&#8221; and &#8220;Eleven&#8221; back-to-back the other night. Conclusions: &#8220;Eleven&#8221; is a better film&#8221;, but the problem is that Mollo has (for the most part) polished a turd to a high-sheen.  Which is all down to problems in the source material rather than the fan-editing. I was impressed by the excellent informative fan-editor commentary track, which helped a lot in understanding the choices made in what to junk from &#8220;Capricorn One&#8221;.</p>
<p>The editing of &#8220;Eleven&#8221; (with the added footage) is excellent, and some of the continuity repair-work + audio reconstruction is outstanding. I especially liked how a lot of needless exposition was got rid of.  That by itself (trimming a good 20 mins of yakking) was a huge improvement  to the flow of the story.</p>
<p>One thing that I noted watching the original is that the premise of &#8220;Capricorn One&#8221; is very strong. It&#8217;s ultra-suspicious conspiratorial core almost carries a duff script and a bunch of so-so performances to the finish line.  Which is probably why its a dynamite candidate for a get-it-right remake (one is in the works right now).</p>
<p>Once the decision was made to junk the entire WTF? crop-dusting biplane rescue the ending of &#8220;Eleven&#8221; has to change from exposure of the conspiracy to its triumph. I think Mollo might have been a bit too aggressive in cutting Elliott Gould&#8217;s part.  And Karen Black&#8217;s reporter did at least serve as a mechanism for getting him pointed towards the conspiracy&#8217;s film-studio in the abandoned airbase. Still, this is just personal taste nit-picking. A very good job indeed, Mollo.  You achieved all your stated objectives, even if the final result is still a bit of a letdown in the conspiracy-thriller dept.</p>
<p>I give it 8/10 for execution and 6/10 for content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flyboy707</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/687/comment-page-1/#comment-11082</link>
		<dc:creator>flyboy707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=687#comment-11082</guid>
		<description>The edit works well and is effective; it&#039;s the source material that is lacking.

This original movie isn&#039;t good.  I have always found the acting to be lack-luster and the plot just too unrealistic (yes, I realize a certain amount of suspension of believe is required of all movies, but this overworks the idea).

The technical side: it lives up to Mollo&#039;s usual level of expertise and the edit succeeds on this point.  I didn&#039;t notice anything that would cause me to comment on (i.e. audio hard cuts etc).

This might be worth watching if you have never seen &quot;Capricorn One&quot; and want a little mindless viewing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The edit works well and is effective; it&#8217;s the source material that is lacking.</p>
<p>This original movie isn&#8217;t good.  I have always found the acting to be lack-luster and the plot just too unrealistic (yes, I realize a certain amount of suspension of believe is required of all movies, but this overworks the idea).</p>
<p>The technical side: it lives up to Mollo&#8217;s usual level of expertise and the edit succeeds on this point.  I didn&#8217;t notice anything that would cause me to comment on (i.e. audio hard cuts etc).</p>
<p>This might be worth watching if you have never seen &#8220;Capricorn One&#8221; and want a little mindless viewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joebshmoe</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/687/comment-page-1/#comment-9280</link>
		<dc:creator>joebshmoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=687#comment-9280</guid>
		<description>capricorn one isn&#039;t what i would call a great movie.  unfortunately i just don&#039;t think this will reach an audience.  the editing ideas are good, and the execution is good, too, but the entertainment is not much improved.  i kinda miss some of those corny performances! LOL

technical quality 4/5
original 3/5
fanedit 3.5/5

3/5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>capricorn one isn&#8217;t what i would call a great movie.  unfortunately i just don&#8217;t think this will reach an audience.  the editing ideas are good, and the execution is good, too, but the entertainment is not much improved.  i kinda miss some of those corny performances! LOL</p>
<p>technical quality 4/5<br />
original 3/5<br />
fanedit 3.5/5</p>
<p>3/5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rock Savage</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/687/comment-page-1/#comment-9037</link>
		<dc:creator>Rock Savage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 18:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=687#comment-9037</guid>
		<description>Comment by Francis on LT Dec 3, 2008

Great stuff. I love the commentary track on this by the fan editor! Wish more fan edits had commentary tracks as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by Francis on LT Dec 3, 2008</p>
<p>Great stuff. I love the commentary track on this by the fan editor! Wish more fan edits had commentary tracks as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
