<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Bond 007: Beyond The Ice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fanedit.org/72/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fanedit.org/72/</link>
	<description>The wonderful world of movies - edited by fans for fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ResidentNice</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/72/comment-page-1/#comment-9039</link>
		<dc:creator>ResidentNice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/wpTF/?p=90#comment-9039</guid>
		<description>I really hope this edit does improve on the original (yes i will watch it), as i think most if not all bond films preceding the Daniel Craig casino Royale were gadget filled nonsense..... even if someone&#039;s argument is that connery was a great actor or that moore or brosnan were also, but my point is there and easily seen. 

If you think a bond film should be over the top and have a gorgeous woman as the &#039;bond girl&#039; you should stick with the pre-Craig bond films, having a gorgeous woman and being over the top does not make a good bond film, i suggest reading (/gasp) the original bond books, then watching Casino Royale again, then i hope you&#039;ll realize what i mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hope this edit does improve on the original (yes i will watch it), as i think most if not all bond films preceding the Daniel Craig casino Royale were gadget filled nonsense&#8230;.. even if someone&#8217;s argument is that connery was a great actor or that moore or brosnan were also, but my point is there and easily seen. </p>
<p>If you think a bond film should be over the top and have a gorgeous woman as the &#8216;bond girl&#8217; you should stick with the pre-Craig bond films, having a gorgeous woman and being over the top does not make a good bond film, i suggest reading (/gasp) the original bond books, then watching Casino Royale again, then i hope you&#8217;ll realize what i mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mohican321</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/72/comment-page-1/#comment-8810</link>
		<dc:creator>mohican321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/wpTF/?p=90#comment-8810</guid>
		<description>Why reedit a perfectly good Bond movie. Yes, it was way, way, waay over the top but it was fun to watch and had Halle Barry in it. Casino Royale needs to be reedited because it sucked big time with its serious approach to Bond and not mention it had the least attractive Bond girl ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why reedit a perfectly good Bond movie. Yes, it was way, way, waay over the top but it was fun to watch and had Halle Barry in it. Casino Royale needs to be reedited because it sucked big time with its serious approach to Bond and not mention it had the least attractive Bond girl ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boon23</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/72/comment-page-1/#comment-1582</link>
		<dc:creator>boon23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 06:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/wpTF/?p=90#comment-1582</guid>
		<description>this has been downloaded a lot with no complaints. part 11 looks good to me. PLease download it again to a different location, clear your temp files, use or don&#039;t use a download manager. Your problem is probably just on your computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this has been downloaded a lot with no complaints. part 11 looks good to me. PLease download it again to a different location, clear your temp files, use or don&#8217;t use a download manager. Your problem is probably just on your computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sluggo</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/72/comment-page-1/#comment-1581</link>
		<dc:creator>Sluggo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/wpTF/?p=90#comment-1581</guid>
		<description>Part 11 is bad.  Can someone kindly upload a good file?  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part 11 is bad.  Can someone kindly upload a good file?  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boon23</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/72/comment-page-1/#comment-1570</link>
		<dc:creator>boon23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 01:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/wpTF/?p=90#comment-1570</guid>
		<description>new links are up now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new links are up now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
