<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise Finale &#8211; No Next Generation: These Are the Voyages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fanedit.org/7948/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fanedit.org/7948/</link>
	<description>The wonderful world of movies - edited by fans for fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:32:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ionvox</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/7948/comment-page-1/#comment-12254</link>
		<dc:creator>ionvox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=7948#comment-12254</guid>
		<description>This was a valiant effort, and I applaud the work that went into this. 
However, since so much time had to be removed due to the holodeck nonsense, this was more like a &quot;sorry-it&#039;s-over-here&#039;s-something-to-send-it-off-with-what-we-wrote-last-night-on-cocktail-napkins&quot;.

Mind you, that&#039;s no fault of Insignia&#039;s. The source material was... &#039;lacking&#039;, to put it lightly.

Anyway, on to the details.

Technical quality: 6/10 with a +1 for effort.
Poor Jonathan Frakes was the bane of this edit in -so- many ways. Pan/Zoom to get him out of the shot degraded the quality a bit. Audio was tolerable for where this came from.

Editing quality: 7/10 with a +1 for effort.
There were some noticeable chops that could&#039;ve been smoothed over with other ship/shuttle/planet external shots from different episodes, but that&#039;s just how I&#039;d try to fill it in. Although, seeing as how I&#039;ve only done five minute edits on youtube, take that with a grain of salt.

Presentation: N/A - avi

Entertainment: 8/10 - This was far better than what was presented on the air, even IF it was so short.

Overall: 7/10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a valiant effort, and I applaud the work that went into this.<br />
However, since so much time had to be removed due to the holodeck nonsense, this was more like a &#8220;sorry-it&#8217;s-over-here&#8217;s-something-to-send-it-off-with-what-we-wrote-last-night-on-cocktail-napkins&#8221;.</p>
<p>Mind you, that&#8217;s no fault of Insignia&#8217;s. The source material was&#8230; &#8216;lacking&#8217;, to put it lightly.</p>
<p>Anyway, on to the details.</p>
<p>Technical quality: 6/10 with a +1 for effort.<br />
Poor Jonathan Frakes was the bane of this edit in -so- many ways. Pan/Zoom to get him out of the shot degraded the quality a bit. Audio was tolerable for where this came from.</p>
<p>Editing quality: 7/10 with a +1 for effort.<br />
There were some noticeable chops that could&#8217;ve been smoothed over with other ship/shuttle/planet external shots from different episodes, but that&#8217;s just how I&#8217;d try to fill it in. Although, seeing as how I&#8217;ve only done five minute edits on youtube, take that with a grain of salt.</p>
<p>Presentation: N/A &#8211; avi</p>
<p>Entertainment: 8/10 &#8211; This was far better than what was presented on the air, even IF it was so short.</p>
<p>Overall: 7/10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flyboy707</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/7948/comment-page-1/#comment-10549</link>
		<dc:creator>flyboy707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=7948#comment-10549</guid>
		<description>&quot;Insignia34 has done just this. Although his editing is quick good ... &quot;

I meant &quot;quite good&quot;.    Sorry for the typo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Insignia34 has done just this. Although his editing is quick good &#8230; &#8221;</p>
<p>I meant &#8220;quite good&#8221;.    Sorry for the typo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flyboy707</title>
		<link>http://fanedit.org/7948/comment-page-1/#comment-10548</link>
		<dc:creator>flyboy707</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fanedit.org/?p=7948#comment-10548</guid>
		<description>before I review this edit, I feel it is important to state one thing first:  I am not a &quot;trekker&quot; or a &quot;trekkie&quot;.  I absolutely love Star Trek; that is to say, most of the series and most of the movies.  My enjoyment of Star Trek does not go beyond this (I don&#039;t read any star trek books, go to conventions collect memorabilia etc).  I have always been objective enough to see that ALL the series have great, good and really bad episodes; and that at least half of the movies are barely watchable.  Yes, I thought the 2009 &quot;re-boot&quot; movie was exactly what Star Trek needed.  

Okay, I liked this series, &quot;Enterprise&quot;.  Certainly at the bottom of my list as Star Trek goes.  so, I did not object to the original version of this episode.  I actually thought it work well (as a Star Trek &quot;Enterprise&quot; episode goes).   When I have watched this episode on my store-bought DVD set,  I have often wondered two things: 1) what this episode would be like if it was edited together with the next generation episode &quot;Pegasus&quot;   or 2) what this episode would be like with all the Riker, Troi and hohlodeck references removed.

Insignia34 has done just this.  Although his editing is quick good, I just don&#039;t think the episode works as well as an &quot;Enterprise&quot; stand-alone episode.  The episode now seems It&#039;s fine, but you can now see how poor the writing on &quot;Enterprise&quot; was most of the time.    Not due to Insignia34&#039;s editing techniques, but due to the lack of material to work with after all the TNG stuff is removed - the episode now seems to run too quick, with not enough developement of the plot and the momumnetal speech by Capt archer at the end. .  Insignia34&#039;s &quot;changing the speed&quot; didn&#039;t quite work for me.

Overall, a great attempt and I will keep this edit and watch it, but will more than likely stick with the original version.

Has anyone out there ever thought of edititng the next gen episode &quot;Pegasus&quot; and the original version of this edit together to form a &quot;mini-movie&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>before I review this edit, I feel it is important to state one thing first:  I am not a &#8220;trekker&#8221; or a &#8220;trekkie&#8221;.  I absolutely love Star Trek; that is to say, most of the series and most of the movies.  My enjoyment of Star Trek does not go beyond this (I don&#8217;t read any star trek books, go to conventions collect memorabilia etc).  I have always been objective enough to see that ALL the series have great, good and really bad episodes; and that at least half of the movies are barely watchable.  Yes, I thought the 2009 &#8220;re-boot&#8221; movie was exactly what Star Trek needed.  </p>
<p>Okay, I liked this series, &#8220;Enterprise&#8221;.  Certainly at the bottom of my list as Star Trek goes.  so, I did not object to the original version of this episode.  I actually thought it work well (as a Star Trek &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; episode goes).   When I have watched this episode on my store-bought DVD set,  I have often wondered two things: 1) what this episode would be like if it was edited together with the next generation episode &#8220;Pegasus&#8221;   or 2) what this episode would be like with all the Riker, Troi and hohlodeck references removed.</p>
<p>Insignia34 has done just this.  Although his editing is quick good, I just don&#8217;t think the episode works as well as an &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; stand-alone episode.  The episode now seems It&#8217;s fine, but you can now see how poor the writing on &#8220;Enterprise&#8221; was most of the time.    Not due to Insignia34&#8217;s editing techniques, but due to the lack of material to work with after all the TNG stuff is removed &#8211; the episode now seems to run too quick, with not enough developement of the plot and the momumnetal speech by Capt archer at the end. .  Insignia34&#8217;s &#8220;changing the speed&#8221; didn&#8217;t quite work for me.</p>
<p>Overall, a great attempt and I will keep this edit and watch it, but will more than likely stick with the original version.</p>
<p>Has anyone out there ever thought of edititng the next gen episode &#8220;Pegasus&#8221; and the original version of this edit together to form a &#8220;mini-movie&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
