Fanedit.org FanEditForum Fanedit.info Preserv.co.cc
Shop Chatroom Register to FE
 
Skip to header | Skip to content
FANEDIT.ORG - HOME OF THE FANEDITS
The Mummy: Year of the Scorpion

a TRUE FANEDIT by Gaith
1999’s The Mummy remains the best archaeology-themed adventure movie since Raiders of the Lost Ark. The sequel was a disaster, but THE MUMMY RETURNS had had some worthwhile elements. This version carefully digs them out.

member ratings:4 votes, average: 6.50 out of 104 votes, average: 6.50 out of 104 votes, average: 6.50 out of 104 votes, average: 6.50 out of 104 votes, average: 6.50 out of 104 votes, average: 6.50 out of 104 votes, average: 6.50 out of 104 votes, average: 6.50 out of 104 votes, average: 6.50 out of 104 votes, average: 6.50 out of 10 (4 votes, average: 6.50 out of 10, rated) Loading ... Loading ...

Original film name The Mummy Returns
Film studio name Universal
Film release date 2001
Original runtime 130 minutes
Fanedit release date February 2010
New runtime 66 minutes
Amount of time cut/added 67 minutes cut. 3 minutes added

EDITING DETAILS:
I honestly believe that (InfoDroid’s fan edits aside) 1999’s The Mummy remains the best archeology-themed adventure movie since Raiders of the Lost Ark. And while there’s no question that The Mummy Returns was a travesty (not only overlong and boring, but positively damaging to the integrity of the first film’s characters), I think it does have an interesting core story.

To wit: The Mummy introduced two couples, Rick and Evelyn and Imhotep and Anck-su-namun. The Mummy Returns questions if their respective loves are indeed real, or simply infatuations. The perils of the Scorpion King’s pyramid will put both relationships to the test. Admit it… that’s a reasonably unique story hook for an action movie sequel, isn’t it?
Unfortunately, this decent and fun flick was buried under lame jokes, lazy plotting and frankly gross insinuations about Evy’s former life. If she’s partly an ancient Egyptian princess, then she’s also partly not her son’s mother, and that’s just messed up. I have therefore removed these noxious elements, as well as any narrative scenes that don’t inform the overall emotional arcs (viz., the Scorpion King intro).
Because at least two superfluous sequences could not be removed invisibly (Evy’s death, the collapsing oasis), I have added a handful of atmospheric title cards, as well as an introduction that humorously explains the necessity of their use. Thus, while my editing is not invisible, I nevertheless hope that the viewing experience is technically seamless. This unconventional method was a last resort, but I’m not apologizing for it. Besides, there may be future rescue attempts by the Des Moines Adventure Film Society! :)

Fanedit history and making:
One warm summer day in 2001, I staggered into my Northern California house. I was nearly fifteen, and had just seen The Mummy Returns, the sequel to my second-favorite film, in a nondescript multiplex where the suburs bleed into the countryside, and the shimmering inland heat had made the car ride back an almost otherworldly experience. While an unusually loud sound system and the spectacle-filled extravaganza had, in conjunction with my considerable anticipation, somewhat dulled my senses, I was dimly aware that the film I’d just seen was not very good. The plot was underthought and often baffling; indeed, one dead character from the first film had somehow been resurrected before the events of the second, and with no explanation whatsoever. While some humorous moments – particularly in the film’s first half – recalled the sly self-referentiality that still makes its predecessor a lively watch, an alarming number of the jokes had fallen flat. And while the sumptuous costumes, majestic score and enchanting scenery had made for a thrilling cinematic experience, there had simply been far too much action that added little to the story or themes. (The celebrated film critic Roger Ebert agreed, writing “Imagine yourself on a roller coaster for two hours. After the first 10 minutes, the thrills subside.”) Still, while all my friends agreed with the popular consensus in labeling the film a disaster, I knew that the picture had had some worthwhile elements. Maybe someday, I thought, I could take to a computer and dig them out.
Throughout the following years, I never got that opportunity, and though I tried revisiting the film on serval occasions, I only became increasingly dismayed by the experience. Still, once or twice a year, I’d take wistful looks at screenshots collected online, and gradually memorized the complete sequence of scenes. I even came up with a favorite theory as to how the aforementioned reincarnation had occurred. My ambition to someday make a fan edit of my own never entirely subsided (indeed, I also found another film I wanted to redact almost as badly – 1985’s Weird Science), but until the summer of 2008, I continued to view any practical possibility of such an effort being at least a few years away. Thanks to the terrific folks of the Fan Edit Forum, however, my dream of eight years has been realized. It is therefore my honor to present to the fan editing community (and anyone who owns a legitimate copy of the theatrical cut) the result, The Mummy: Year of the Scorpion.

CUTLIST:

• Added titles explaining the necessity of title cards
• Added a prologue from The Mummy
• Removed all scenes before the O’Connell Manor
• Removed all references to Evy being a reincarnation of a long-dead princess. No, she isn’t.
• Numerous trims to the fight in the manor.
• Removed all references to Rick being a Medjai. This subplot had potential, but it’s superfluous.
• Shortened Imhotep’s reincarnation. Rick and Ardeth don’t encounter awkward mummies in the British Museum, and they certainly don’t watch the rites without making any effort to stop them.
• Various trims to the Museum sequence. Alex doesn’t talk about the golden pyramid’s diamond, Jonathan isn’t such a slobbering coward and the shootout is shortened.
• The bus chase has been almost entirely excised. It didn’t move the story forward, and we’ve already had a lot of action.
• We never see the painfully unfunny motley thugs alive. Who cares?
• Various trims to make Izzy less annoying. Rick no longer threatens to shoot him.
• Cut the twelve tribes of the Medjai. No way were there that many of ‘em!
• Cut Ardeth’s silly bird in all but one shot.
• Meela’s transformation into Anck-su-namun is now uninterrupted, and it’s in aged grayscale.
• Alex no longer makes sandcastles; he merely draws maps.
• The wall of water has been heavily reduced.
• Ardeth doesn’t hold his sword to Jonathan’s throat, nor does he talk about Anubis’ army.
• Numerous cuts to the pygmy attack to keep the story moving as quickly as possible.
• Rick doesn’t outrun the sun.
• Evy doesn’t die, nor does she get reincarnated and fight Anck. Jonathan doesn’t fight Anck either.
• The Medjai don’t fight the warrior-dogs… at all.
• The Rick vs. Imhotep fight is drastically reduced.
• Most of the close-ups on the CG Scorpion King’s face have been removed.
• The entire collapsing oasis scene is excised. Ahm Shere survives!
• Heavy cuts to the denouement. The credits are now greyscale. The title specifies that it’s an edit.
• Appended a Mummy 3 “best moments” reel.

Disclaimer: You must own the original movie before acquiring any FanEdited movie. We here at FanEdit.org respect the company’s copyrights, and don’t want to infringe on any company’s rights. Thank you, FE!

Maybe downloadable from Fanedit.info (enter and download at your own risk and responsibility)

FANEDITFORUM LINK ADDITIONAL ARTICLE IMAGES / COVER ART TECH INFO VIDEOS / TRAILER

2 Review »

  1. A good edit. There are some “rough” areas that are noticeable but don’t really detract from the overall viewing.

    I especially liked the “film restoration” style of this edit. Gaith took the worst part of this movie (the opening with The Rock) and made it a fun, classic horror movie part (much like the original 1930’s “The Mummy”). Gaith might have over-used the “damaged film” look a little too much in the opeing and there is a very rough edit/cut/transition to the main movie at this point, but overall it is a great start to a mediocre movie. The fade in and fade outs are a little too long (while dialogue has started or is still going as the fade starts/stops), but gain not so long as to seriously detract from the edit.

    I DL’d the DVD version and the overall quality is good (4 out of 5), audio is good too (4/5).

    Gaith has taken, for me, a very disappoiting film and made it a much better experience. I have a feeling others might take issue with the drastic reduction of “action”, but for me, it was what was needed. Honestly, I get very bored with long action scenes. I am glad Evy the re-icarnation plot references are gon as well as the too long Pygmy attack scenes – without the long-winded pygmy scenes, the movie becomes MUCH more quick-paced without losing plot.

    Review by flyboy707 — December 14, 2009 @ 10:10 pm

  2. I commend you for taking out the Evey reinacarnation and Rick Medjai subplots. However, your edit is actually less enjoyable than the original movie. It also had way too many hard cuts.

    Review by hbenthow — July 24, 2010 @ 7:44 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a REVIEW:

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Theme by boon23, powered by WordPress

Superman Pictures (except for Superman Returns: Copyright CapedWonder.com; Bowers Imagineering; Warner Bros; and DC Comics. All Rights Reserved 2006. Used by permission from Jim Bowers. Visitors to the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites are advised that all fanedits contained within the pages of the websites are believed to be fanedits and/or preservation projects of films from personal collections which fall under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include— 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Since fanedits contained here are mainly created out of criticisms, research, and are completely nonprofit, we here at the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites believe that they fall under the requirements of the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107. However, no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information are made. Visitors are encouraged to review the official version of all documents upon which they plan to download as well as to make completely sure they own a legitimate, original copy of anything they may wish to download. The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites cannot give this permission. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Links to Other Sites - Some of the linked sites are not under the control of the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites. Therefore, the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websitesmake no representations concerning their content, and are not responsible for their content. That the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites have provided a link to a site is not an endorsement, or an indication of affiliation with the owners or publishers of any fanedits and all related materials. There are risks in using any information, services or fanedits found on the Internet via any outside links; and the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites caution you to make sure that you completely understand these risks before retrieving, using, relying upon, or downloading anything via the Internet. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Members, Fanedits and Links The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites reserves the right to refuse services at any time. Notification that Information Provided by You is Public Information Any information provided by you to the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites, including but not limited to feedback, questions, comments, suggestions, download links, etc., etc., are considered non-confidential since it is a public website; moreover, such information is a public record subject to public inspection pursuant to law. The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites has no obligation of any kind with respect to such information and cannot be held responsible for the decisions nor the actions of any individuals of the entire Internet community at large. By downloading any fanedit, the downloader assumes all responsibilities thereof as well as all the consequences that may incur. CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED!

THIS WEBSITE DOES WORK WELL WITH FIREFOX AND GOOGLE CHROME