- QuickCut on Star Wars Episode I: The Ridiculous Menace: My cousin said this: “OH MY GOSH. That was one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen! I loved pretty much every part of the lightsaber duel, especially ‘macho man’ and ‘NOOOOOO!’ I also like the part where Anakin is flying around after the podrace with the music.”, (this post has 18 comments)
- QuickCut on JAWS The Sharksploitation Edit: This was hilarious and often brilliant. It has a couple flaws, but it’s very entertaining (BIG SPOILERS follow). Technical quality – 10/10 – can’t really comment on A/V issues as they were supposed to be there. Editing – 10/10 – just incredible. Presentation – 10/10 – the cover art was great and the menu was nice. Brody at the theater was a clever and idea and pulled off well. Entertainment –…, (this post has 39 comments)
- njvc on Matrix Revolutions: The Epic Edition: I finally got to watch this epic edit tonight, and was highly impressed with the skill and creativity that went into it. It looked and sounded superb, made some fantastic cuts and, overall, was a much much more enjoyable experience than sitting through the two sequels (especially revolutions, I still quite enjoy reloaded as a stand alone film.) Video: I watched the bluray, and was taken to that…, (this post has 8 comments)
- QuickCut on Quantum of Solace: Bond’s Revenge : Nice job! This isn’t quite my preferred version of QoS, but it’s still a great edition. Technical quality – 10/10 – I didn’t notice any audio problems, and the video was perfect. Unlike Aztek463, I didn’t notice any frame rate problems, but maybe I’m just not looking close enough. Either way, it didn’t detract from the entertainment at all. Presentation – 10/10 – the cover art is nice and the…, (this post has 7 comments)
- baileym43 on The Walking Dead Apocalypse : it’s funny the last reviewer, MetroStar, watched this while sick because i did the same thing. seemed appropriate to watch a zombie movie when i felt like one. dude, 10 of 10 for me. video = great. audio = great. cuts = amazing. story = entertaining, moreso maybe because it moved along faster. i can’t wait to share this with a buddy of mine who loves the show too. nice work, i hope…, (this post has 4 comments)
- ionvox on The Dark Knight: Rise and Fall of Harvey Two-Face: Rave, Rave, Rave, Rave! This is a completely fantastic edit of what was a good Batman movie to begin with. The pacing is better; the characters are more in line with their personalities; and it’s completely enthralling. There aren’t enough superlatives for this. Video: 10/10 No pixelation or artifacts. This is near DVD quality. Audio: 10/10 Excellent in a headset. No idea on 5.1…., (this post has 4 comments)
- ionvox on Batman: Year One: Mmph. Two MIA’s and an outdated rapidshare (meaning offline). Anyone know where this is located now?, (this post has 4 comments)
- ionvox on BATTLESTAR GALACTICA: THE SECOND COMING: To be honest, I was unsure about this type of edit. However, with the editor being Bionic Bob, the idea had merit. Sure, it cuts out a lot of dramatization, but there is a lot to be said for the credo ‘less is more’. This is a fantastic merger of old and new. Bob has taken a lot of scenes from the entirety of the series and ‘movies’ to make this a unique approach. All of…, (this post has 5 comments)
- amatar on Star Wars Begins: All links are down
, (this post has 8 comments)
- Mark on Star Wars Episode I: The Ridiculous Menace: I’ve been around this project from the beginning and I understand some of the frustrations expressed by a few of the reviewers. There are a fair amount of ‘inside jokes’ in this edit which may be lost on the casual viewer. This edit is meant for the pretty serious fan of Star Wars, the kind who have the movies memorized. If this is your first exposure to Star Wars, you…, (this post has 18 comments)
- leeroy0115 on Star Wars Episode I: The Ridiculous Menace: Just to echo what others have said I found a lot of the gags to be unfunny though comedy is a selective taste. The consent choppy to the dialogue soon became annoying to the point I just wanted the Phantom Menace instead. While the Phantom Menace was lacking in plot the edit to me removed any and all story, if I’d never seen the Phantom Menace before I wouldn’t had a clue what was…, (this post has 18 comments)
- nOmArch on Fight Club: Pull No Punches Edition: The image is exactly the same as the commercial copy I used to make the edit from. The deleted scenes are not that bad at all or at least look pretty comparable to the rest of the flick. Based from viewing it on my 42″ The scenes were never meant to make the movie any better, the whole goal of this edit was to remove the changes forced on the production team by the studio and to present…, (this post has 3 comments)
- QuickCut on The War Of The Stars: A New Hope Grindhoused: I was looking forward to watching this one since it had such great reviews. Unfortunately, it was a little bit of a letdown. There were parts that were brilliant and other parts that just weren’t. Technical quality -10/10 –it’s supposed to be poor-ish video quality, so I can’t really comment on this section. All the downgrading of the video was done well though, so I’ll give it a 10. Editing…, (this post has 43 comments)
- LastSurvivor on 21 Grams Rebalanced: Sometimes you just have to sit back and be grateful that the world of the fanedit can bring such diverse delights. For every Superman or Star Wars edit, there’s a L.A. Confidential or a Killing of a Chinese Bookie. It should be no surprise therefore that the editor of the last film mentioned, is the person responsible for being brave enough to attempt a linear edit of Alejandro González…, (this post has 1 comments)
- gugliemo on A Failed Expedition to the Lost World: Jurassic Park: An improvement overall, but the ending feels a bit sudden. (Sorry I don’t have more details, I watched this fanedit over a year ago but forgot to review it!) The restored deleted scene is wonderful. Alas it doesn’t feel like a complete movie, but it is still quite enjoyable. Original – 5/10 Fanedit – 7/10, (this post has 3 comments)
- gugliemo on STAR TREK “This other Eden”: Review of Bionic Bob’s Star Trek V “This Other Eden” First things first I shall declare my colours. I’m a sci-fi fan but not really a Trekkie, I’ve watched a fair few episodes from TOS, fewer still from Next Gen. I have a lot of respect for the franchise, but I was always more of a Stargate/Babylon 5 kinda guy. Regarding the films, I watched the first five on DVD last year. TMP is my favourite,…, (this post has 6 comments)
- gugliemo on Raiders of the Lost Skull: Review of Raiders of the Lost Skull by NVJC I haven’t watched the theatrical cut in a couple of years, so I wasn’t able to fully compare this to the original. On the other hand, this allowed me to watch this film in it’s own right, without constantly noticing what was present and absent. On the whole, this greatly improves on the original, which I never hated but thought had…, (this post has 16 comments)
- QuickCut on Star Wars Episode I: The Ridiculous Menace: I haven’t laughed this hard all year. Technical quality – 10/10 – audio and video were both fine. Presentation – 10/10 – nice menu, nice cover art. Editing – 7/10 – the video editing was flawless and just the fact that you merged all those different scenes and audio clips was incredible. I took off a couple points because the audio editing was so horrible, but you can’t really work around that…., (this post has 18 comments)
- emphatic on BATTLESTAR GALACTICA: THE SECOND COMING: I rated this a 10/10 as I was simply blown away. The source material is fantastic, but with this edit it shines even brighter IMHO. I frakkin’ loved it and feel I need to check out the original show as well., (this post has 5 comments)
- L8wrtr on L.A. Confidential Recut: L.A. Confidential has long been on my rather shameful list of movies I somehow missed seeing, but knew I needed to. So with Neglify’s release I finally had the kick to go out and buy the film and watch it so I could see what this FEOTM winner had done. I should first start with my brief evaluation of the original. Midway through watching it I turned to my wife and pondered what in the…, (this post has 3 comments)
- QuickCut on Transformers (UA Edit): This probably is my favorite version of Transformers. Big improvement over the original. I liked the rearranging of scenes and pacing. Technical quality – 9/10 – there were a couple parts where the audio seemed too quiet/too loud. There were lots of parts with choppy video, but I’m guessing this was a problem created when I burned the disc, not an error in the original video. Editing – 10/10 –…, (this post has 18 comments)
- Uncanny Antman on Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 – a steFANedit: I always kind of preferred BW2 to the first film, despite obvious flaws. Listening to the director’s commentary actually made me like it a little less though, as I lamented the version of the film we didn’t get. Thankfully, we finally do have it in the form of steFAN’s edit. Maybe not exactly what the director would have released if given the chance, but as close as you can…, (this post has 2 comments)
- amatar on BATTLESTAR GALACTICA: THE SECOND COMING: K…got all parts (thank you very much!) and now that I’m finished watching it, I shall submit a short review… First off, I want to say that the original 2004 pilot bothered me for no other reason than the Baltar sex-scene garbage. This almost destroyed the whole thing for me right off the hop, as it was SO far removed from the 1978 series. This has been fixed without a hitch in…, (this post has 5 comments)
- QuickCut on Casino Royale – Straight Flush Edition: Casino Royale – Straight Flush Edition This is probably my preferred version of the film. Technical quality – 10/10 – no complaints here. Editing – 10/10 – no hard cuts or anything. I felt like I was watching a movie and not a FanEdit. Presentation – 7/10 – the menu was a little too simple for my taste and there was no scene selection, but you did have a special feature. Entertainment –…, (this post has 5 comments)
- jamiemark on Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2 – a steFANedit: Please check part 18., (this post has 2 comments)
- QuickCut on Star Wars: Return of the Jedi – The Spence Final Cut: This isn’t my go-to version of ROTJ, but it’s pretty well done. Technical quality – 8/10 – in general, the video was pretty good quality, but there was some flickering or something during the opening crawl. The audio was great except for the end credits when the volume abruptly went really high. Presentation – 8/10 – special features and scene selection were…, (this post has 19 comments)
- Neglify on LOST: The Miniseries – Part 2: DriggyDriggs’ Lost Mini-Series Part 2 is just as good as his first part. All the editing is nicely done and the story flows well. The biggest improvement is that Claire is no longer completely wacko. She’s still pretty crazy, but it’s toned down to the absolute minimum. Season 6 of LOST isn’t perfect, but it’s vastly improved now. 9/10., (this post has 1 comments)
- amatar on BATTLESTAR GALACTICA: THE SECOND COMING: …sorry…file 15 is missing too…sorry for not putting these as a single post <:), (this post has 5 comments)
- amatar on BATTLESTAR GALACTICA: THE SECOND COMING: Part 5 is missing, (this post has 5 comments)
- baileym43 on Matrix Revolutions: The Epic Edition: i just watched this and it’s certainly an improvement over the studio version. audio is great. video is amazing. clearly no issues there. sure, sure, there were a few odd fade-to-blacks. sometimes they happened to quick. sometimes they were too close together. sometimes a hard cut would have worked better. and there are some awkward moments. the Oracle suddenly smoking her cigarette. Neo…, (this post has 8 comments)
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Theme by boon23, powered by WordPress
Superman Pictures (except for Superman Returns: Copyright CapedWonder.com; Bowers Imagineering;
Warner Bros; and DC Comics. All Rights Reserved 2006. Used by permission from Jim Bowers.
Visitors to the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites are advised that all fanedits contained within the pages of the websites are believed to be fanedits and/or preservation projects of films from personal collections which fall under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states:
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Since fanedits contained here are mainly created out of criticisms, research, and are completely nonprofit, we here at the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites believe that they fall under the requirements of the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107. However, no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information are made. Visitors are encouraged to review the official version of all documents upon which they plan to download as well as to make completely sure they own a legitimate, original copy of anything they may wish to download. The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites cannot give this permission.
Legal Disclaimer Regarding Links to Other Sites -
Some of the linked sites are not under the control of the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites. Therefore, the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websitesmake no representations concerning their content, and are not responsible for their content. That the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites have provided a link to a site is not an endorsement, or an indication of affiliation with the owners or publishers of any fanedits and all related materials. There are risks in using any information, services or fanedits found on the Internet via any outside links; and the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites caution you to make sure that you completely understand these risks before retrieving, using, relying upon, or downloading anything via the Internet.
Legal Disclaimer Regarding Members, Fanedits and Links
The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites reserves the right to refuse services at any time.
Notification that Information Provided by You is Public Information
Any information provided by you to the fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites, including but not limited to feedback, questions, comments, suggestions, download links, etc., etc., are considered non-confidential since it is a public website; moreover, such information is a public record subject to public inspection pursuant to law. The fanedit.org and faneditforum.com websites has no obligation of any kind with respect to such information and cannot be held responsible for the decisions nor the actions of any individuals of the entire Internet community at large. By downloading any fanedit, the downloader assumes all responsibilities thereof as well as all the consequences that may incur.
CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED!