Review Detail
8.9 4 10Overall rating
6.7
Audio/Video Quality
7.0
Audio Editing
8.0
Visual Editing
8.0
Narrative
4.0
Enjoyment
6.0
A/V quality was passable, but significantly lower than the source material for reasons unknown.
Editing was decent, but, as gddgb mentions, some of the choices as to what was cut, or how things were cut, do detract from the experience.
And, yeah, editing this film into chronological format just doesn't work. Destroys the narrative and makes everything sort of uninteresting.
Editing was decent, but, as gddgb mentions, some of the choices as to what was cut, or how things were cut, do detract from the experience.
And, yeah, editing this film into chronological format just doesn't work. Destroys the narrative and makes everything sort of uninteresting.