Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Edits, The

Hot
Updated
 
9.3 (4)
 
9.8 (74)
20055 1 62

User reviews

71 reviews with 9-10 stars
74 reviews
 
96%
 
4%
5-7 stars
 
0%
3-5 stars
 
0%
1-3 stars
 
0%
Overall rating
 
9.8
Audio/Video Quality
 
9.9(74)
Audio Editing
 
9.8(74)
Visual Editing
 
9.8(74)
Narrative
 
9.6(74)
Enjoyment
 
9.8(74)
Back to Listing
71 results - showing 41 - 45
« 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... »
Ordering
Overall rating
 
10.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
10.0
Enjoyment
 
10.0
Oh yes!
After having the Maple edit for some time, I now got this jewel! As others mentioned before, this will definitively be my go-to version!
It's got great pacing, and while M4's edit is also rather trimmed, this here has more... magic:
It's not purely the book, but only the good ideas were left in from Jackson's original, so you have that grandeur which made LOTR so special without feeling ridiculous or bloated to the max and then some more on top!
It's utterly charming and made me smile several times, so joyful was the ride into Middle-Earth! Everything I read before I watched this edit regarding its strenghts is true. THIS really is what I expected when I went to the movies back then...
Then, there's technically flawless editing from visuals and audio - THANK YOU!!!!

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched
Digital
Report this review Comments (1) | Was this review helpful? 2 0
Overall rating
 
10.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
10.0
Enjoyment
 
10.0
After the masterpiece that was Peter Jackson's "Lord of the Rings" trilogy, most of us felt less-than-enthusiastic about the final result of the Hobbit Trilogy. And as an owner of the bloated extended edition Blu-Rays, I personally felt like the magic was gone from Jackson's Tolkien vision. The Hobbit was, to me, only slightly better than the Prequel trilogies were to the Star Wars franchise.

With Fanedits, we are often left with "the best that could be managed" with weak source material (again, see the Star Wars prequels). Nothing can turn Hayden Christensen into a great actor or a believable Darth Vader. But unlike the Star Wars prequels, Stromboli Bones has revealed the absolute DIAMOND that was hidden in a chunk of coal.

Excised are the ridiculous elements and the grotesque. The excesses have been trimmed. And what we have left is an absolute worthy prequel to the cinematic masterpiece "The Lord of the Rings."

The Hobbit was Tolkien's foray into writing a story for children, set in the world of Middle Earth he had been developing for decades. "The Lord of the Rings" was a far more adult tale. Literarily, there is a completely different feel between the two masterworks, even though they were penned by the same author. When I originally saw "The Hobbit" in the theaters, there were times I felt it was hard to believe these were taking place in the same world. Thanks to the efforts of Stromboli Bones and the other prior editors who helped contribute to this fanedit, this now FEELS like it should.

The Fellowship of the Ring was released in 2001. The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey was released in 2012. A decade is a long time for an actor to return to a role and portray a younger version of themselves. One of good things about this fanedit is that scenes with actors reprising their roles have been trimmed or minimized. Now I am able to enjoy the film without thinking, "Wow, that actor didn't age well" or some other thoughts that take me out of the story.

For all of Peter Jackson's excesses, he at least gave us all the elements of a great film filled with great portrayals and incredible visuals. There was a lot of fat around the meat, but once that fat has been trimmed, you are left with an incredible piece of cinema and that is this fanedit's greatest achievement. Unlike Amazon's "The Rings of Power," the spirit of Tolkien resides within Jackson's "The Hobbit," and through this fanedit, we can see it clearly.

Absolutely BRILLIANT! Bravo!!! Thank you, Stromboli Bones!

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched
Digital
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 1 0
(Updated: September 27, 2022)
Overall rating
 
9.8
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
9.0
Enjoyment
 
10.0
For many of us, Tolkien's "The Hobbit" holds a special place in our hearts. For me, it is *the* book that got me into reading. I was excited when the movies were announced, nervous when production problems were reported, and dismayed at the final product. It is an unwatchable mess. I love sharing with my sons the things with which I grew up. We go go-carting, play old school AD&D, hit up the classic arcade, and listen to real rock 'n roll. It is beyond disappointing that we can't share "The Hobbit."

Until now. M4 Book was my first fan edit experience of "The Hobbit" and it is a fantastic telling. It is *tight.* It ruthlessly excises all the extraneous nonsense from the theatrical films, and is possibly the definitive cut *if you want the most faithful book adaptation possible.*

Therein lies the rub. Book and film are two very different mediums, and what works in one doesn't necessarily work in the other. Also, Tolkien's "on the ground" storytelling sometimes has issues, like too many Deus Ex Machina events. One example would be the arrival of the great eagles at the Battle of the Five Armies. If there's any fault with M4 Book, it's scene duration. They start a beat late, cut a couple of beats in the middle, and end a beat too soon. As I said, this edit is *tight.* It hits the ground running and barely stops to catch a breath.

That's where Stromboli Bones' "The Battle of the Five Edits" really comes into its own. Scenes that are stripped to their core in M4 Book are here fleshed out. The Mirkwood sequence is a good example. Lost from M4 Book is the sense of just how long The Company was in there, and especially the feeling of just how heavy the enchantment was, and how it weighed upon them. Bones restores that, and it's just about spot on.

The Battle of the Five Armies is similar. M4 Book cuts the entire battle down to 20 minutes (in keeping with Bilbo being unconscious for most of it). Bones has it at ~38 minutes, and it does a great job of showing how the battle progresses and why it's important for Thorin to go to Ravenhill. It also fixes some continuity errors, like the sudden re-appearance of Orcrist in Thorin's hands.

Also of note is that Bones' re-uses editor Adam Dens' cut of the united Dwarf & Elf army vs the Orc army initial clash, getting rid of the horrific nonsense of the Elves leaping over Dwarven phalanx.

I don't think it's perfect, but barring my own masterful cut (rofl) seeing the light of day, this is the version I'm sharing with my sons.

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched
Digital
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 1 0
(Updated: September 16, 2022)
Overall rating
 
9.8
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
9.0
Narrative
 
10.0
Enjoyment
 
10.0
This edit is an absolute triumph. If the case were ever to be made that The Hobbit would be better told as a multi-part TV Series than three overstuffed movies then this is the proof that it could, and in fact, here it's already been done.

Gone are the overly cheesy comedy moments, gone is the forced and ridiculous romance movie, gone are all the heavy handed references to the LotR movies. Yet, even with hours of footage removed this feels like it's straddling the line between honouring Peter Jackson's original style and honouring the silliness and musicality that really was part of the Hobbit book.

Editing-wise this is nigh on perfect and Stromboli Bones has seamlessly stitched many sequences together with nary a tell of their previous editing. Use of swelling musical themes and dialogue cut from other scenes and overlaid on others is incredibly clever and used sparingly to ensure no narrative beat is missed. Can you sometimes tell a scene has been edited? Yes, perhaps. In a few places there are signs that a conversation was cut short but the seamless nature of the transition onto the next scene carries it. An editor with the original footage would have used an alternate take with different delivery to wrap up a scene earlier but (with what he has to work with) the editing is amazing. He's ostensibly done the work the editing team should have originally done, cutting superfluous dialogue and needless comedy larks to keep the narrative moving on this epic journey.

A bonus feature of the split into 5 parts is that you can now watch this bit by bit, as though you're watching a TV Show each night. There are clear moments to take a bathroom break or grab a drink. And even if you do choose to binge every chapter at once, it's only 5 hours and not the bloated 9+ hours of the original edit. Fantastic work. This is the version I'll always watch in future.

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched
Digital
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 1 0
(Updated: September 16, 2022)
Overall rating
 
9.5
Audio/Video Quality
 
10.0
Audio Editing
 
10.0
Visual Editing
 
10.0
Narrative
 
8.0
Enjoyment
 
9.0
Very fine handling of the CGI cringe-fest of the theatrical version of the Middle Earth opus The Hobbit. Stromboli's is a noteworthy addition to the efforts among the educated fan-base to turn a turgid slab of marble into a beautiful statue.

Most omissions are timely and well considered although I have a minor issue with the sudden appearance of Orcs in the final battle, a direct result of the expunging of the Azog subplot from the original film. There is a common shared view between fan editors of the Hobbit trilogy that Azog is a foreign, Peter Jackson-imported element in the saga which is of course true if one wishes to stick to the novel but in the context of the films Azog served as a primary antagonist whose presence haunted the company climaxing into the Orc attack. Therefore the final confrontation between Thorin and Azog comes naturally and not somewhat abruptly as in this and other fan edits. Besides, Azog is shot in a way that indicates a pretty important big shot (not a replaceable Orc commander like Gothmog in The Return of the King). Probably no editing can change that.

Nevertheless, this edit made me appreciate the film infinitely more. The Hobbit is essentially a road story, much like The Fellowship of the Ring (in my view the best of the LotR trilogy) and this cut certainly comes close to the task of elevating the commercialized Hobbit trilogy to the quality ranks of the latter film. The episodic format the editor follows was quite clever and fitting to the structure of the story and it helped neutralize some editing issues like the transition from film 1 to film 2 of the trilogy. This fan edit is undoubtedly a work of great care and love. I feel, however, that the ultimate The Hobbit fan edit, is yet to be found.

User Review

Do you recommend this edit?
Yes
Format Watched
Digital
Report this review Comments (1) | Was this review helpful? 1 0
71 results - showing 41 - 45
« 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... »