- Internet Fanedit Database
- Fanedit Listings
- FanFix
- In The Mouth Of Madness Re-Cut
In The Mouth Of Madness Re-Cut
Updated
Faneditor Name:
Original Movie/Show Title:
Genre:
Fanedit Type:
Original Release Date:
1995
Original Running Time:
95 minutes
Fanedit Release Date:
Fanedit Running Time:
86 minutes
Time Cut:
9 minutes
Additional Links:
Synopsis:
It’s more darker and more suspenseful version of the the movie.
Intention:
To create a darker and more suspenseful version of the the movie. To create a more mysterious version of the film.
Release Information:
DVD
Editing Details:
Took the beginning and placed it at the end. So now we don’t have a flashback, we have a straight through story line. Removed the flashes for less give-a-ways. Also removed the children scenes. They were Boorific….
Faneditor Name:
Original Movie/Show Title:
Genre:
Fanedit Type:
Original Release Date:
1995
Original Running Time:
95 minutes
Fanedit Release Date:
Fanedit Running Time:
86 minutes
Time Cut:
9 minutes
Additional Links:
Synopsis:
It’s more darker and more suspenseful version of the the movie.
Intention:
To create a darker and more suspenseful version of the the movie. To create a more mysterious version of the film.
Release Information:
DVD
Editing Details:
Took the beginning and placed it at the end. So now we don’t have a flashback, we have a straight through story line. Removed the flashes for less give-a-ways. Also removed the children scenes. They were Boorific….
Cover art by CBB (DOWNLOAD HERE)
Trusted Reviewer review
1 review
(Updated: September 12, 2012)
Overall rating
4.0
Audio/Video Quality
N/A
Audio Editing
N/A
Visual Editing
N/A
Narrative
N/A
Enjoyment
4.0
February 14, 2012
Sorry but I didn’t think much of this one. Narratively, it works well for the most part, we don’t need the prologue to set the story in motion and the bits you excised along are not missed. However, when you place the removed prologue at the end, it has the effect of stopping the movie dead cold with the “introduction” of things we already know at that point. It should have been heavily trimmed IMO. Also, I regret you cut out the final scene. Ending the movie with the theater poster is kinda “huh?”
The worst problem, however, is the sub-par video quality. It’s interlaced, letterboxed, heavily pixelated, and too dark. One can barely see what’s happening in some of the darker moments. Audio-wise, there’s a hard cut 42 minutes into the film, after Sutter’s line “Do you like my ending?”.
I know this edit is five years old already, and I feel kind of bad pointing this stuff out now, but since there was no other comment I thought it might be informative. I also wish I could rate it higher, but 4/10 from me.
Sorry but I didn’t think much of this one. Narratively, it works well for the most part, we don’t need the prologue to set the story in motion and the bits you excised along are not missed. However, when you place the removed prologue at the end, it has the effect of stopping the movie dead cold with the “introduction” of things we already know at that point. It should have been heavily trimmed IMO. Also, I regret you cut out the final scene. Ending the movie with the theater poster is kinda “huh?”
The worst problem, however, is the sub-par video quality. It’s interlaced, letterboxed, heavily pixelated, and too dark. One can barely see what’s happening in some of the darker moments. Audio-wise, there’s a hard cut 42 minutes into the film, after Sutter’s line “Do you like my ending?”.
I know this edit is five years old already, and I feel kind of bad pointing this stuff out now, but since there was no other comment I thought it might be informative. I also wish I could rate it higher, but 4/10 from me.
User reviews
2 reviews
Overall rating
7.5
Audio/Video Quality
N/A(0)
Audio Editing
N/A(0)
Visual Editing
N/A(0)
Narrative
N/A(0)
Enjoyment
7.5(2)
(Updated: September 12, 2012)
Overall rating
6.0
Audio/Video Quality
N/A
Audio Editing
N/A
Visual Editing
N/A
Narrative
N/A
Enjoyment
6.0
May 24, 2009
*This rating was given before reviews were required*
*This rating was given before reviews were required*