No, It Really Is Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein

Updated
 
7.8 (5)
2738 1 0
No, It Really Is Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein
Faneditor Name:
Original Movie/Show Title:
Genre:
Fanedit Type:
Original Release Date:
1994
Original Running Time:
123 minutes
Fanedit Release Date:
Fanedit Running Time:
113 minutes
Time Cut:
10 minutes
Synopsis:
By cutting out the re-animation scenes of Elizabeth this now gets way closer to the original book.
Intention:
This gets rid of a completely unnecessary subplot that detracts from an otherwise faithful rendition of the story.
Release Information:
DVD
Cuts and Additions:
Removes the part where Frankenstein tries to reanimate Elizabeth.
Faneditor Name:
Original Movie/Show Title:
Genre:
Fanedit Type:
Original Release Date:
1994
Original Running Time:
123 minutes
Fanedit Release Date:
Fanedit Running Time:
113 minutes
Time Cut:
10 minutes
Synopsis:
By cutting out the re-animation scenes of Elizabeth this now gets way closer to the original book.
Intention:
This gets rid of a completely unnecessary subplot that detracts from an otherwise faithful rendition of the story.
Release Information:
DVD
Cuts and Additions:
Removes the part where Frankenstein tries to reanimate Elizabeth.
Cover art by Kracker (DOWNLOAD HERE)
image

Faneditor Name:
Original Movie/Show Title:
Genre:
Fanedit Type:
Original Release Date:
1994
Original Running Time:
123 minutes
Fanedit Release Date:
Fanedit Running Time:
113 minutes
Time Cut:
10 minutes
Synopsis:
By cutting out the re-animation scenes of Elizabeth this now gets way closer to the original book.
Intention:
This gets rid of a completely unnecessary subplot that detracts from an otherwise faithful rendition of the story.
Release Information:
DVD
Cuts and Additions:
Removes the part where Frankenstein tries to reanimate Elizabeth.
Cover art by Kracker (DOWNLOAD HERE)
image

User reviews

5 reviews
Overall rating
 
7.8
Audio/Video Quality
 
N/A(0)
Audio Editing
 
N/A(0)
Visual Editing
 
N/A(0)
Narrative
 
N/A(0)
Enjoyment
 
7.8(5)
(Updated: September 08, 2012)
Overall rating
 
8.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
N/A
Audio Editing
 
N/A
Visual Editing
 
N/A
Narrative
 
N/A
Enjoyment
 
8.0
March 30, 2009 @ 11:25 am

*This rating was given before reviews were required*
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
(Updated: September 08, 2012)
Overall rating
 
10.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
N/A
Audio Editing
 
N/A
Visual Editing
 
N/A
Narrative
 
N/A
Enjoyment
 
10.0
November 16, 2008 @ 4:06 am

*This rating was given before reviews were required*
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
(Updated: September 11, 2012)
Overall rating
 
10.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
N/A
Audio Editing
 
N/A
Visual Editing
 
N/A
Narrative
 
N/A
Enjoyment
 
10.0
November 6, 2008 @ 1:21 pm

*This rating was given before reviews were required*
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
(Updated: September 08, 2012)
Overall rating
 
6.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
N/A
Audio Editing
 
N/A
Visual Editing
 
N/A
Narrative
 
N/A
Enjoyment
 
6.0
November 4, 2008 @ 4:38 am

*This rating was given before reviews were required*
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0
(Updated: September 08, 2012)
Overall rating
 
5.0
Audio/Video Quality
 
N/A
Audio Editing
 
N/A
Visual Editing
 
N/A
Narrative
 
N/A
Enjoyment
 
5.0
November 27, 2009 @ 7:29 pm

Unfortunately it does not at all save this movie from being really bad (and lame).
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful? 0 0