- Internet Fanedit Database
- Fanedit Listings
- FanFix
- Star Wars - Episode VI: Return of the Jedi – The Spence Edit
Star Wars - Episode VI: Return of the Jedi – The Spence Edit
Updated
Faneditor Name:
Original Movie/Show Title:
Genre:
Franchise:
Fanedit Type:
Original Release Date:
1983
Original Running Time:
130 minutes
Fanedit Release Date:
Fanedit Running Time:
100 minutes
Time Cut:
20 minutes
Additional Links:
Synopsis:
To present Return of the Jedi without the Ewoks. This makes the tone of the film more consistent. It’s now a darker ending to the star wars trilogy.
Intention:
To present Return of the Jedi without the Ewoks. This makes the tone of the film more consistent. A lot of the very childish and cheesy scenes have been removed. It’s now a darker ending to the star wars trilogy.
Release Information:
DVD
Cuts and Additions:
Removed the Ewoks, made Han Solo less of a little girl, removed some horrible lines.
Faneditor Name:
Original Movie/Show Title:
Genre:
Franchise:
Fanedit Type:
Original Release Date:
1983
Original Running Time:
130 minutes
Fanedit Release Date:
Fanedit Running Time:
100 minutes
Time Cut:
20 minutes
Additional Links:
Synopsis:
To present Return of the Jedi without the Ewoks. This makes the tone of the film more consistent. It’s now a darker ending to the star wars trilogy.
Intention:
To present Return of the Jedi without the Ewoks. This makes the tone of the film more consistent. A lot of the very childish and cheesy scenes have been removed. It’s now a darker ending to the star wars trilogy.
Release Information:
DVD
Cuts and Additions:
Removed the Ewoks, made Han Solo less of a little girl, removed some horrible lines.
Cover art by AvP (
User reviews
15 reviews
Overall rating
7.5
Audio/Video Quality
9.0(1)
Audio Editing
N/A(0)
Visual Editing
6.0(1)
Narrative
N/A(0)
Enjoyment
7.2(15)
(Updated: September 09, 2012)
Overall rating
7.0
Audio/Video Quality
N/A
Audio Editing
N/A
Visual Editing
N/A
Narrative
N/A
Enjoyment
7.0
Review by Hrumpff — April 12, 2010 @ 4:37 pm
*This rating was given before reviews were required*
*This rating was given before reviews were required*
(Updated: September 09, 2012)
Overall rating
7.0
Audio/Video Quality
N/A
Audio Editing
N/A
Visual Editing
N/A
Narrative
N/A
Enjoyment
7.0
Review by Matt_Jensen — April 12, 2010 @ 4:28 pm
*This rating was given before reviews were required*
*This rating was given before reviews were required*
(Updated: September 09, 2012)
Overall rating
6.0
Audio/Video Quality
N/A
Audio Editing
N/A
Visual Editing
N/A
Narrative
N/A
Enjoyment
6.0
Review by Link — February 22, 2009 @ 2:59 am
*This rating was given before reviews were required*
*This rating was given before reviews were required*
(Updated: September 09, 2012)
Overall rating
6.0
Audio/Video Quality
N/A
Audio Editing
N/A
Visual Editing
N/A
Narrative
N/A
Enjoyment
6.0
Review by joebshmoe — February 13, 2009 @ 6:25 pm
(In reference to the 1.0 cut)
This was entertaining, but did not feel like an improvement. The pacing suffers from the editing choices. A great idea that may or may not be improved? 3/5
(In reference to the 1.0 cut)
This was entertaining, but did not feel like an improvement. The pacing suffers from the editing choices. A great idea that may or may not be improved? 3/5
(Updated: September 09, 2012)
Overall rating
6.0
Audio/Video Quality
N/A
Audio Editing
N/A
Visual Editing
N/A
Narrative
N/A
Enjoyment
6.0
Review by spelledaren — December 30, 2008 @ 9:41 am
*This rating was given before reviews were required*
*This rating was given before reviews were required*
